Artificial-intelligence-assisted inverse design of low-carbon concrete under carbonation constraints

This study develops and tests an artificial-intelligence-assisted inverse-design workflow for supplementary-cementitious-material-blended concrete, with artificial intelligence applied to surrogate prediction, uncertainty quantification, dosage-effect interpretation, and multi-objective candidate generation. Optuna-tuned feedforward neural networks were trained on four open datasets and coupled with split conformal prediction, continuous-treatment forest analysis, and non-dominated multi-objective search. The source-aware compressive-strength model achieved a mean absolute error of 7.20 megapascals and a coefficient of determination of 0.687. Under standard cross-validation, embodied carbon achieved a mean absolute error of 2.41 and a coefficient of determination of 0.999, while carbonation depth achieved a mean absolute error of 2.56 millimetres and a coefficient of determination of 0.847. A leakage audit showed that the exceptional embodied-carbon fit is largely attributable to an almost deterministic relation between mixture quantities and the carbon target, although performance was sensitive to source grouping. Continuous-treatment re-analysis showed substantial pre-adjustment imbalance and wide ninety-five-percent effect intervals, so the dosage results are interpreted conditionally rather than as universal causal effects. Three-objective optimization produced seventy-two computational candidates; sixteen, or 22.2 percent, had negative raw carbonation predictions and were excluded from representative reporting. A physically non-negative balanced candidate predicted 75.8 megapascals strength, 141.7 embodied carbon, and 0.064 millimetres carbonation depth. Applicability-domain analysis showed that none of the optimized candidates lay inside a strict joint ninety-five-percent domain for all retained endpoints, emphasizing that the generated mixtures are hypotheses for laboratory validation rather than design-ready prescriptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.116633
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Artificial-intelligence-assisted inverse design of low-carbon concrete under carbonation constraints

Adewumi John Babafemi, Paul Oluwaseun Awoyera, Lenganji Simwanda
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Artificial-intelligence-assisted inverse design of low-carbon concrete under carbonation constraints

Adewumi John Babafemi, Paul Oluwaseun Awoyera, Lenganji Simwanda
article en

Abstract

This study develops and tests an artificial-intelligence-assisted inverse-design workflow for supplementary-cementitious-material-blended concrete, with artificial intelligence applied to surrogate prediction, uncertainty quantification, dosage-effect interpretation, and multi-objective candidate generation. Optuna-tuned feedforward neural networks were trained on four open datasets and coupled with split conformal prediction, continuous-treatment forest analysis, and non-dominated multi-objective search. The source-aware compressive-strength model achieved a mean absolute error of 7.20 megapascals and a coefficient of determination of 0.687. Under standard cross-validation, embodied carbon achieved a mean absolute error of 2.41 and a coefficient of determination of 0.999, while carbonation depth achieved a mean absolute error of 2.56 millimetres and a coefficient of determination of 0.847. A leakage audit showed that the exceptional embodied-carbon fit is largely attributable to an almost deterministic relation between mixture quantities and the carbon target, although performance was sensitive to source grouping. Continuous-treatment re-analysis showed substantial pre-adjustment imbalance and wide ninety-five-percent effect intervals, so the dosage results are interpreted conditionally rather than as universal causal effects. Three-objective optimization produced seventy-two computational candidates; sixteen, or 22.2 percent, had negative raw carbonation predictions and were excluded from representative reporting. A physically non-negative balanced candidate predicted 75.8 megapascals strength, 141.7 embodied carbon, and 0.064 millimetres carbonation depth. Applicability-domain analysis showed that none of the optimized candidates lay inside a strict joint ninety-five-percent domain for all retained endpoints, emphasizing that the generated mixtures are hypotheses for laboratory validation rather than design-ready prescriptions.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 186
Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Northrise University (ZM), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon