Structural design and simulation-based optimization of a PCB-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator for fuze safety-and-arming mechanisms

Conventional fuze safety-and-arming (S&A) mechanisms often rely on setback or centrifugal forces, whereas electrically driven pin pullers and motor–lead-screw units may require relatively long axial travel. This study presents a printed circuit board (PCB)-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator designed to switch between functional positions through 180° rotor rotation while retaining a potential reverse-drive path. The investigation focuses on the electromagnetic drive subsystem rather than the complete S&A mechanism. An electromechanical model was established using the voltage balance, back electromotive force, torque–current relation, rotor inertia, and equivalent resisting torque. A three-dimensional transient finite-element model was used to evaluate the effects of air gap and permanent-magnet thickness on 180° positioning time. The spatial magnetic-field distribution, friction-related resistance, and eddy-current losses were considered when interpreting the results. Within the investigated air-gap range of 0.5–1.1 mm, the shortest positioning time in the air-gap sweep was 45.0 ms at 1.1 mm. With this gap fixed, a magnet thickness of 1.2 mm yielded a finite-element positioning time of 42.6 ms, compared with 40.3 ms from the analytical model (a 5.40% difference relative to the finite-element result). A simplified prototype reached 180° in 35.8 ms at 5 A, compared with 33.98 ms from a simulation using the corresponding low-friction boundary conditions (a 5.08% difference relative to the measured time). These results support the drive model under the tested conditions; full-device locking, release, reverse recovery, and cyclic reliability remain to be verified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Engineering Innovation
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-3903/2026.38764
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Structural design and simulation-based optimization of a PCB-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator for fuze safety-and-arming mechanisms

Rui Guo, Yachao Zhang, Zheyu Fang, Yang Li et al.
Advances in Engineering Innovation
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
article

Structural design and simulation-based optimization of a PCB-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator for fuze safety-and-arming mechanisms

Rui Guo, Yachao Zhang, Zheyu Fang, Yang Li, Shuangjie Liu
article en

Abstract

Conventional fuze safety-and-arming (S&A) mechanisms often rely on setback or centrifugal forces, whereas electrically driven pin pullers and motor–lead-screw units may require relatively long axial travel. This study presents a printed circuit board (PCB)-stator axial-flux electromagnetic rotary actuator designed to switch between functional positions through 180° rotor rotation while retaining a potential reverse-drive path. The investigation focuses on the electromagnetic drive subsystem rather than the complete S&A mechanism. An electromechanical model was established using the voltage balance, back electromotive force, torque–current relation, rotor inertia, and equivalent resisting torque. A three-dimensional transient finite-element model was used to evaluate the effects of air gap and permanent-magnet thickness on 180° positioning time. The spatial magnetic-field distribution, friction-related resistance, and eddy-current losses were considered when interpreting the results. Within the investigated air-gap range of 0.5–1.1 mm, the shortest positioning time in the air-gap sweep was 45.0 ms at 1.1 mm. With this gap fixed, a magnet thickness of 1.2 mm yielded a finite-element positioning time of 42.6 ms, compared with 40.3 ms from the analytical model (a 5.40% difference relative to the finite-element result). A simplified prototype reached 180° in 35.8 ms at 5 A, compared with 33.98 ms from a simulation using the corresponding low-friction boundary conditions (a 5.08% difference relative to the measured time). These results support the drive model under the tested conditions; full-device locking, release, reverse recovery, and cyclic reliability remain to be verified.

Advances in Engineering InnovationVol. 17(11)
Shenyang Ligong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon