A Daily Diary Evaluation of the Rumination Domains Questionnaire

The Rumination Domains Questionnaire (RDQ) assesses the content of ruminative thought across 10 life domains. Previous cross-sectional research has supported its reliability and criterion validity, but the RDQ has not been examined using longitudinal methods. In a seven-day daily diary study, 119 North American adults completed the RDQ, the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) at baseline, then reported daily time spent ruminating in each domain, amotivation, and negative mood. Each RDQ subscale correlated positively with average daily rumination in its corresponding domain and predicted it in multilevel models. Incremental validity over the RRS and RRQ varied by domain, but it was strongest for romantic, existential, and cleanliness domains; modest support for incremental validity in achievement, sociopolitical, and appearance domains; partial for social and financial domains and no clear evidence for health and family domains of rumination. The RDQ total score correlated with daily negative mood and amotivation and incrementally predicted both beyond the RRS and RRQ. Overall, the results support the validity of the RDQ, although the added value of domain-specific assessment varies across life domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Reports
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941261506337
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Daily Diary Evaluation of the Rumination Domains Questionnaire

Julie Aitken Schermer, Donald H. Saklofske, Christopher Marcin Kowalski
Psychological Reports
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

A Daily Diary Evaluation of the Rumination Domains Questionnaire

Julie Aitken Schermer, Donald H. Saklofske, Christopher Marcin Kowalski
article en

Abstract

The Rumination Domains Questionnaire (RDQ) assesses the content of ruminative thought across 10 life domains. Previous cross-sectional research has supported its reliability and criterion validity, but the RDQ has not been examined using longitudinal methods. In a seven-day daily diary study, 119 North American adults completed the RDQ, the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) at baseline, then reported daily time spent ruminating in each domain, amotivation, and negative mood. Each RDQ subscale correlated positively with average daily rumination in its corresponding domain and predicted it in multilevel models. Incremental validity over the RRS and RRQ varied by domain, but it was strongest for romantic, existential, and cleanliness domains; modest support for incremental validity in achievement, sociopolitical, and appearance domains; partial for social and financial domains and no clear evidence for health and family domains of rumination. The RDQ total score correlated with daily negative mood and amotivation and incrementally predicted both beyond the RRS and RRQ. Overall, the results support the validity of the RDQ, although the added value of domain-specific assessment varies across life domains.

Psychological Reports
Western University (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon