The effect of sintering hold-time on heat transfer relevant properties of 3D-printed copper and bronze samples produced by bound powder extrusion

Abstract Bound Powder Extrusion (BPE) is in principle an excellent opportunity for the heat transfer industry as high thermal conductivity metals can be manufactured with relative ease and at low cost. The process uses a filament made from a mixture of metal powder and polymeric binder to print parts on a low-cost consumer-grade printer, whereafter debinding and sintering remove the binder. However, the properties of the printed parts are still relatively unknown. In this study, copper and bronze parts were manufactured using BPE, with the parts being thermally debound and sintered to produce pure metal components. These parts were then characterised across several properties. For copper samples, it was found to lose about 8% of its mass during manufacturing and shrank by 12–30% as sintering hold time was increased. Similarly, bronze lost about 10% of its mass and shrank by 20–40%. Porosity and thermal conductivity were found to be functions of sintering time, varying by 25–45% and 40–70 W/mK, respectively, for copper and 27–45% and 2–9 W/m for bronze, which represents between 6 and 20% of the respective solid metals’ thermal conductivity. Pore formation was caused by delamination from gas build-up or voids left by the binding material removal. Specific heat capacity of copper and bronze was found to be like solid parts, with carbon impurities thought to be the cause of any differences seen. Surface roughness and hardness were found to be non-homogeneous across the samples. The roughness of the samples was significantly higher than that of samples produced by traditional subtractive manufacturing processes, while hardness’s were 30–50% of the respective solid samples, pointing to lower strength of the parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-026-02044-5
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The effect of sintering hold-time on heat transfer relevant properties of 3D-printed copper and bronze samples produced by bound powder extrusion

Bradley D. Bock, Roy Urwin
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

The effect of sintering hold-time on heat transfer relevant properties of 3D-printed copper and bronze samples produced by bound powder extrusion

Bradley D. Bock, Roy Urwin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bound Powder Extrusion (BPE) is in principle an excellent opportunity for the heat transfer industry as high thermal conductivity metals can be manufactured with relative ease and at low cost. The process uses a filament made from a mixture of metal powder and polymeric binder to print parts on a low-cost consumer-grade printer, whereafter debinding and sintering remove the binder. However, the properties of the printed parts are still relatively unknown. In this study, copper and bronze parts were manufactured using BPE, with the parts being thermally debound and sintered to produce pure metal components. These parts were then characterised across several properties. For copper samples, it was found to lose about 8% of its mass during manufacturing and shrank by 12–30% as sintering hold time was increased. Similarly, bronze lost about 10% of its mass and shrank by 20–40%. Porosity and thermal conductivity were found to be functions of sintering time, varying by 25–45% and 40–70 W/mK, respectively, for copper and 27–45% and 2–9 W/m for bronze, which represents between 6 and 20% of the respective solid metals’ thermal conductivity. Pore formation was caused by delamination from gas build-up or voids left by the binding material removal. Specific heat capacity of copper and bronze was found to be like solid parts, with carbon impurities thought to be the cause of any differences seen. Surface roughness and hardness were found to be non-homogeneous across the samples. The roughness of the samples was significantly higher than that of samples produced by traditional subtractive manufacturing processes, while hardness’s were 30–50% of the respective solid samples, pointing to lower strength of the parts.

Progress in Additive Manufacturing
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon