Stalemate in the Anthropocene: Ineffective Treaties and the Struggle for Planetary Governance

This paper traces the evolution of global environmental agreements from 1971 to 2025 and explains why a dense treaty architecture has not delivered commensurate improvements in planetary conditions. Using qualitative comparative document analysis of major multilateral environmental agreements across climate, biodiversity, and pollution, the paper codes objectives, institutional designs, and observed performance. It integrates regime complex theory, planetary boundaries, and environmental justice to interpret recurrent weaknesses in this regime complex. The analysis identifies three consistent empirical patterns. First, implementation and enforcement gaps persist across issue areas, as global indicators for biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution-related mortality continue to diverge from agreed goals and targets. Second, states respond to the triple planetary crisis through a fragmented institutional landscape that multiplies mandates and reporting obligations while achieving limited coordination or policy integration. Third, distributive and procedural injustices endure because populations that contribute least to environmental degradation bear disproportionate harms and confront chronic shortfalls in finance, technology transfer, and voice in decision-making. These three patterns reinforce one another and create a structurally underpowered regime complex when evaluated against planetary boundaries and justice claims. The paper argues that incremental treaty proliferation cannot close these gaps. Instead, global environmental governance must shift toward implementation-centered Conferences of the Parties, stronger but fair compliance mechanisms, deliberate inter-regime coordination, and justice-oriented reforms in finance and rights. This diagnosis provides a foundation for future empirical evaluations of treaty impact and for normative debates on how to realize a safe and just operating space for humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i5.1763
Primary Topic
International Environmental Law and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Stalemate in the Anthropocene: Ineffective Treaties and the Struggle for Planetary Governance

Benjamin Damoah, Eunice Ofori, Sagini Keengwe
International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science
International Environmental Law and Policies
article

Stalemate in the Anthropocene: Ineffective Treaties and the Struggle for Planetary Governance

Benjamin Damoah, Eunice Ofori, Sagini Keengwe
article en

Abstract

This paper traces the evolution of global environmental agreements from 1971 to 2025 and explains why a dense treaty architecture has not delivered commensurate improvements in planetary conditions. Using qualitative comparative document analysis of major multilateral environmental agreements across climate, biodiversity, and pollution, the paper codes objectives, institutional designs, and observed performance. It integrates regime complex theory, planetary boundaries, and environmental justice to interpret recurrent weaknesses in this regime complex. The analysis identifies three consistent empirical patterns. First, implementation and enforcement gaps persist across issue areas, as global indicators for biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution-related mortality continue to diverge from agreed goals and targets. Second, states respond to the triple planetary crisis through a fragmented institutional landscape that multiplies mandates and reporting obligations while achieving limited coordination or policy integration. Third, distributive and procedural injustices endure because populations that contribute least to environmental degradation bear disproportionate harms and confront chronic shortfalls in finance, technology transfer, and voice in decision-making. These three patterns reinforce one another and create a structurally underpowered regime complex when evaluated against planetary boundaries and justice claims. The paper argues that incremental treaty proliferation cannot close these gaps. Instead, global environmental governance must shift toward implementation-centered Conferences of the Parties, stronger but fair compliance mechanisms, deliberate inter-regime coordination, and justice-oriented reforms in finance and rights. This diagnosis provides a foundation for future empirical evaluations of treaty impact and for normative debates on how to realize a safe and just operating space for humanity.

International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social ScienceVol. 7(5)
Tulane University (US), University of North Dakota (US), University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
International Environmental Law and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon