Functional recovery with perioperative asynchronous telerehabilitation in colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Purpose To determine whether asynchronous digital monitoring, individualized progression, reminders, and physiotherapist support provide additional functional benefit over a content-matched perioperative home rehabilitation program after colorectal cancer surgery. Methods This single-center, assessor-masked randomized clinical trial assigned 80 adults 1:1 to telerehabilitation or booklet-based rehabilitation. Both groups received respiratory, aerobic, and progressive resistance exercise plus perioperative education. The primary outcome was 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at approximately 50 days after surgery (T4). Secondary outcomes included functional mobility, pulmonary function, physical activity, adherence, and satisfaction. Usability was assessed among telerehabilitation participants. Between-group clinical analyses were adjusted for baseline values and age. Results Eighty participants were randomized, 40 per group. The adjusted between-group difference in 6MWT distance at T4 was not significant (P = .180). No significant adjusted between-group differences were observed for functional mobility, pulmonary function, or physical activity. Overall recorded adherence was higher with telerehabilitation than with booklet-based rehabilitation (69.6% vs 52.8%; difference, 16.8 percentage points; P = .002). Satisfaction at T4 favored telerehabilitation (P = .044). Among telerehabilitation participants, total usability increased from 6.24 to 6.68 of 7 (P < .001). Conclusion In adults undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, both rehabilitation strategies were associated with functional recovery, while asynchronous telerehabilitation did not confer additional short-term functional benefit. The digital approach was associated with greater recorded adherence and end-of-program satisfaction, suggesting potential value in engagement and continuity of rehabilitation delivery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06593678; registered 29 August 2024. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06593678. Registered 29 August 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11211502/v1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Functional recovery with perioperative asynchronous telerehabilitation in colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial

Carolina Jiménez‐Sánchez, Beatriz Carpallo‐Porcar, Sandra Calvo, Juan Luis Blas-Laína et al.
Research Square
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
preprint

Functional recovery with perioperative asynchronous telerehabilitation in colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial

Carolina Jiménez‐Sánchez, Beatriz Carpallo‐Porcar, Sandra Calvo, Juan Luis Blas-Laína, Natalia Brandín‐de la Cruz, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Lilian Le Roux-Ethève
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To determine whether asynchronous digital monitoring, individualized progression, reminders, and physiotherapist support provide additional functional benefit over a content-matched perioperative home rehabilitation program after colorectal cancer surgery. Methods This single-center, assessor-masked randomized clinical trial assigned 80 adults 1:1 to telerehabilitation or booklet-based rehabilitation. Both groups received respiratory, aerobic, and progressive resistance exercise plus perioperative education. The primary outcome was 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at approximately 50 days after surgery (T4). Secondary outcomes included functional mobility, pulmonary function, physical activity, adherence, and satisfaction. Usability was assessed among telerehabilitation participants. Between-group clinical analyses were adjusted for baseline values and age. Results Eighty participants were randomized, 40 per group. The adjusted between-group difference in 6MWT distance at T4 was not significant (P = .180). No significant adjusted between-group differences were observed for functional mobility, pulmonary function, or physical activity. Overall recorded adherence was higher with telerehabilitation than with booklet-based rehabilitation (69.6% vs 52.8%; difference, 16.8 percentage points; P = .002). Satisfaction at T4 favored telerehabilitation (P = .044). Among telerehabilitation participants, total usability increased from 6.24 to 6.68 of 7 (P < .001). Conclusion In adults undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, both rehabilitation strategies were associated with functional recovery, while asynchronous telerehabilitation did not confer additional short-term functional benefit. The digital approach was associated with greater recorded adherence and end-of-program satisfaction, suggesting potential value in engagement and continuity of rehabilitation delivery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06593678; registered 29 August 2024. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06593678. Registered 29 August 2024.

Research Square
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Hospital Royo Villanova (ES), Universidad San Jorge (ES)
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon