Computational and experimental screening identifies 6-chloro-2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde derivatives as disruptors of the HEG1–KRIT1 protein–protein interaction

The HEG1–KRIT1 protein–protein interaction is a central regulatory interface in cerebral cavernous malformation signaling and represents a potential target for small-molecule modulation. In this study, a focused library of 1,121 compounds containing a 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde scaffold was screened to identify candidate HEG1–KRIT1 disruptors. Compounds were prioritized through drug-likeness filtering, PAINS/reactivity assessment, diversity and purchasability evaluation, AutoDock Vina docking, short molecular dynamics refinement, and MM/PBSA rescoring. Three candidates, HN1, HN2, and HN3, were selected for 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations, free-energy analyses, in silico ADMET profiling, and experimental evaluation using a bead-based flow-cytometry HEG1–KRIT1 competition assay. Docking and simulation analyses suggested that all three candidates could occupy the HEG1-recognition region of the KRIT1 FERM domain and maintain ligand–protein contacts during the simulations. Among the tested compounds, HN1 yielded a modest positive ΔΔG PPI estimate of + 2.66 kcal/mol, whereas HKi2, HN2, and HN3 yielded negative estimates; these values were interpreted descriptively as approximate indicators of ligand-dependent changes in the HEG1–KRIT1 interface. Experimental testing showed concentration-dependent inhibition of EGFP–KRIT1 FERM binding to HEG1-coated beads. Under the applied assay conditions, HN1 produced the numerically lowest IC₅₀ estimate at 3.51 ± 0.14 µM, compared with 3.90 ± 0.13 µM for HKi2, while HN2 and HN3 produced IC₅₀ estimates of 24.12 ± 1.59 and 31.63 ± 1.99 µM, respectively. These numerical differences do not establish superiority or equivalence among the compounds. Collectively, the computational and experimental findings support HN1 as a preliminary hit that warrants further target-engagement, mechanistic, and cellular validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76453-5
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Computational and experimental screening identifies 6-chloro-2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde derivatives as disruptors of the HEG1–KRIT1 protein–protein interaction

Badriah Saleh Alammari, Fahad M. Alshabrmi, Emadeldin M. Kamel, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl et al.
Scientific Reports
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Computational and experimental screening identifies 6-chloro-2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde derivatives as disruptors of the HEG1–KRIT1 protein–protein interaction

Badriah Saleh Alammari, Fahad M. Alshabrmi, Emadeldin M. Kamel, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl, Haifa Essa Alfassam, Raghad A. Alotaibi, May Bin-Jumah, Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi
article en

Abstract

The HEG1–KRIT1 protein–protein interaction is a central regulatory interface in cerebral cavernous malformation signaling and represents a potential target for small-molecule modulation. In this study, a focused library of 1,121 compounds containing a 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde scaffold was screened to identify candidate HEG1–KRIT1 disruptors. Compounds were prioritized through drug-likeness filtering, PAINS/reactivity assessment, diversity and purchasability evaluation, AutoDock Vina docking, short molecular dynamics refinement, and MM/PBSA rescoring. Three candidates, HN1, HN2, and HN3, were selected for 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations, free-energy analyses, in silico ADMET profiling, and experimental evaluation using a bead-based flow-cytometry HEG1–KRIT1 competition assay. Docking and simulation analyses suggested that all three candidates could occupy the HEG1-recognition region of the KRIT1 FERM domain and maintain ligand–protein contacts during the simulations. Among the tested compounds, HN1 yielded a modest positive ΔΔG PPI estimate of + 2.66 kcal/mol, whereas HKi2, HN2, and HN3 yielded negative estimates; these values were interpreted descriptively as approximate indicators of ligand-dependent changes in the HEG1–KRIT1 interface. Experimental testing showed concentration-dependent inhibition of EGFP–KRIT1 FERM binding to HEG1-coated beads. Under the applied assay conditions, HN1 produced the numerically lowest IC₅₀ estimate at 3.51 ± 0.14 µM, compared with 3.90 ± 0.13 µM for HKi2, while HN2 and HN3 produced IC₅₀ estimates of 24.12 ± 1.59 and 31.63 ± 1.99 µM, respectively. These numerical differences do not establish superiority or equivalence among the compounds. Collectively, the computational and experimental findings support HN1 as a preliminary hit that warrants further target-engagement, mechanistic, and cellular validation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Beni-Suef University (EG), Qassim University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Deanship of Scientific Research, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon