Prevalences and determinants of belief and lack of belief in gender identity in representative UK and US samples

Abstract The term “gender identity” is widely used. However, its meaning is often uncertain, ranging from a euphemism for sex to an “internal sense of gender,” or a combination of levels of masculinity/femininity and beliefs about one’s sex and presentation. Given differences and uncertainties in the definition of gender identity, this research assessed prevalences and determinants of belief and lack of belief in having a gender identity. Three samples from the UK ( N s = 302 and 300) and the US ( N = 301) (ages 18–87; mean age 45.74 (SD = 15.75), 431 males, 472 females), representative for national sex and age distributions, were recruited via the online platform Prolific. Participants were presented with 15 sets of questions. Each set included a factual biographic question (e.g., interest in sports), a question on presence or absence of an identity related to the biography question, and an importance rating of that identity if present. A response of ‘No’ to the question ‘Do you have a gender identity?’ was given by 23.6% and 21.1% of the UK samples, and 20.3% of the US sample. Gender identity was more likely to be affirmed by females (Odds Ratio = 1.79) and by those who hold strong critical social justice attitudes (OR = 1.67). Females gave higher ratings for the importance of their gender identity than did males (OR = 2.09). Future research should investigate the different understandings individuals have of the term gender identity and longitudinally assess societal changes in prevalence of belief or lack of belief in gender identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11634290/v1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Prevalences and determinants of belief and lack of belief in gender identity in representative UK and US samples

Mark Blagrove, Nicholas Alvaro Coles
1 links
Research Square
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
preprint

Prevalences and determinants of belief and lack of belief in gender identity in representative UK and US samples

Mark Blagrove, Nicholas Alvaro Coles
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract The term “gender identity” is widely used. However, its meaning is often uncertain, ranging from a euphemism for sex to an “internal sense of gender,” or a combination of levels of masculinity/femininity and beliefs about one’s sex and presentation. Given differences and uncertainties in the definition of gender identity, this research assessed prevalences and determinants of belief and lack of belief in having a gender identity. Three samples from the UK ( N s = 302 and 300) and the US ( N = 301) (ages 18–87; mean age 45.74 (SD = 15.75), 431 males, 472 females), representative for national sex and age distributions, were recruited via the online platform Prolific. Participants were presented with 15 sets of questions. Each set included a factual biographic question (e.g., interest in sports), a question on presence or absence of an identity related to the biography question, and an importance rating of that identity if present. A response of ‘No’ to the question ‘Do you have a gender identity?’ was given by 23.6% and 21.1% of the UK samples, and 20.3% of the US sample. Gender identity was more likely to be affirmed by females (Odds Ratio = 1.79) and by those who hold strong critical social justice attitudes (OR = 1.67). Females gave higher ratings for the importance of their gender identity than did males (OR = 2.09). Future research should investigate the different understandings individuals have of the term gender identity and longitudinally assess societal changes in prevalence of belief or lack of belief in gender identity.

Research Square
Swansea University (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon