Partner Preference Strength is not Influenced by How Motivated Juvenile Male Rats are to Engage in Play Fighting

Rats frequently engage in rough-and-tumble play, and do so in pairs. However, when multiple partners are present, some individuals are preferred more than others. Rats that have been isolated from their peers show increased motivation to engage in rough-and-tumble play. When publishing papers on group play in rats, we have been asked by several reviewers whether the time spent in social isolation to increase play motivation inadvertently reduces partner preferences. To address this question, we investigated how varying periods of social isolation (0, 2.5, E. J. Marijke Achterberg212, and 24 h) influences partner preferences of focal Long Evans rats when interacting with one unfamiliar Long Evans partner and one unfamiliar Fischer 344 partner. Regardless of the degree to which the rats were motivated to play, partner preferences remained stable across isolation times. This suggests that the general drive to play is independent of the motivation to select a specific partner. Unexpectedly, the preference for same-strain partners was not as strong as in previous studies with larger groups, highlighting that group size and social context are critical factors that can alter social dynamics and potentially override established partner preferences. These findings underscore the importance of group composition in the study of social behavior and suggest that partner preferences may reflect stable social compatibilities rather than transient changes in play motivation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2026-11-03
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partner Preference Strength is not Influenced by How Motivated Juvenile Male Rats are to Engage in Play Fighting

Jackson Ham, AISS – Behavioural Neuroscience, Sergio Pellis, Marijke Achterberg et al.
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
article

Partner Preference Strength is not Influenced by How Motivated Juvenile Male Rats are to Engage in Play Fighting

Jackson Ham, AISS – Behavioural Neuroscience, Sergio Pellis, Marijke Achterberg, AISS Behavioural Neuroscience, Diya Daiswal
article en

Abstract

Rats frequently engage in rough-and-tumble play, and do so in pairs. However, when multiple partners are present, some individuals are preferred more than others. Rats that have been isolated from their peers show increased motivation to engage in rough-and-tumble play. When publishing papers on group play in rats, we have been asked by several reviewers whether the time spent in social isolation to increase play motivation inadvertently reduces partner preferences. To address this question, we investigated how varying periods of social isolation (0, 2.5, E. J. Marijke Achterberg212, and 24 h) influences partner preferences of focal Long Evans rats when interacting with one unfamiliar Long Evans partner and one unfamiliar Fischer 344 partner. Regardless of the degree to which the rats were motivated to play, partner preferences remained stable across isolation times. This suggests that the general drive to play is independent of the motivation to select a specific partner. Unexpectedly, the preference for same-strain partners was not as strong as in previous studies with larger groups, highlighting that group size and social context are critical factors that can alter social dynamics and potentially override established partner preferences. These findings underscore the importance of group composition in the study of social behavior and suggest that partner preferences may reflect stable social compatibilities rather than transient changes in play motivation.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon