Territory-based ultrasound assessment for extracranial and vertebrobasilar arterial stenosis and carotid plaque vulnerability: a multicentre comparison with digital subtraction angiography and histopathology

Introduction The diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based vascular assessment may vary by anatomical territory. We evaluated territory-specific ultrasound techniques for cervicocerebral arterial stenosis and compared cervical duplex ultrasound (CDU) with computed tomography angiography (CTA) for identifying carotid plaque vulnerability. Methods This retrospective multicentre study included 234 patients with ultrasound-based assessment, CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examinations conducted between January 2022 and January 2025, contributing 620 evaluable arterial segments. DSA was the reference standard for moderate-to-severe (>=50%) stenosis. In a separate analysis of 56 patients with matched carotid endarterectomy specimens, histopathology was the reference standard for plaque vulnerability. Results Across all arterial segments, territory-specific ultrasound assessment yielded a sensitivity of 79.56%, specificity of 81.79% and moderate agreement with DSA (kappa = 0.61). Diagnostic-performance point estimates were higher for extracranial segments assessed by CDU than for intracranial vertebrobasilar segments assessed by transcranial Doppler-based ultrasonography (sensitivity, 86.09% vs 62.50%; specificity, 85.20% vs 75.47%; kappa, 0.71 vs 0.38). For histologically confirmed carotid plaque vulnerability, CDU showed a sensitivity of 86.84%, specificity of 77.78% and accuracy of 83.93%; the corresponding CTA estimates were 31.58%, 100.00% and 53.57%. Discussion Ultrasound-based assessment showed complementary strengths across vascular territories. CDU demonstrated reliable performance for extracranial stenosis and higher sensitivity than routine CTA for vulnerable carotid plaques in this selected endarterectomy cohort, while transcranial Doppler-based ultrasonography provided additional haemodynamic information for intracranial vertebrobasilar disease despite lower diagnostic performance. These findings support territory-appropriate ultrasound as part of multimodal imaging rather than as a replacement for CTA or DSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1957579
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Territory-based ultrasound assessment for extracranial and vertebrobasilar arterial stenosis and carotid plaque vulnerability: a multicentre comparison with digital subtraction angiography and histopathology

Hongxiang Fu, Sun Litao, Weina Jia, 同亚军 et al.
Frontiers in Neurology
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Territory-based ultrasound assessment for extracranial and vertebrobasilar arterial stenosis and carotid plaque vulnerability: a multicentre comparison with digital subtraction angiography and histopathology

Hongxiang Fu, Sun Litao, Weina Jia, 同亚军, Fengqin Shen, Shicheng Yin, Ting Lin, Yuping Shen, Xiangyu Meng, Ying Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction The diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based vascular assessment may vary by anatomical territory. We evaluated territory-specific ultrasound techniques for cervicocerebral arterial stenosis and compared cervical duplex ultrasound (CDU) with computed tomography angiography (CTA) for identifying carotid plaque vulnerability. Methods This retrospective multicentre study included 234 patients with ultrasound-based assessment, CTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examinations conducted between January 2022 and January 2025, contributing 620 evaluable arterial segments. DSA was the reference standard for moderate-to-severe (>=50%) stenosis. In a separate analysis of 56 patients with matched carotid endarterectomy specimens, histopathology was the reference standard for plaque vulnerability. Results Across all arterial segments, territory-specific ultrasound assessment yielded a sensitivity of 79.56%, specificity of 81.79% and moderate agreement with DSA (kappa = 0.61). Diagnostic-performance point estimates were higher for extracranial segments assessed by CDU than for intracranial vertebrobasilar segments assessed by transcranial Doppler-based ultrasonography (sensitivity, 86.09% vs 62.50%; specificity, 85.20% vs 75.47%; kappa, 0.71 vs 0.38). For histologically confirmed carotid plaque vulnerability, CDU showed a sensitivity of 86.84%, specificity of 77.78% and accuracy of 83.93%; the corresponding CTA estimates were 31.58%, 100.00% and 53.57%. Discussion Ultrasound-based assessment showed complementary strengths across vascular territories. CDU demonstrated reliable performance for extracranial stenosis and higher sensitivity than routine CTA for vulnerable carotid plaques in this selected endarterectomy cohort, while transcranial Doppler-based ultrasonography provided additional haemodynamic information for intracranial vertebrobasilar disease despite lower diagnostic performance. These findings support territory-appropriate ultrasound as part of multimodal imaging rather than as a replacement for CTA or DSA.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 17
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Westlake University (CN), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon