Incident health-related and social-disruption events, cumulative burden, and depressive symptom risk in adults aged 50 years and older: a multinational longitudinal cohort study

Incident health-related and social-disruption events may mark periods of heightened depressive symptom vulnerability in later life. However, cross-national evidence on their co-occurrence, component-level associations, and cumulative burden remains limited, constraining evidence-based risk stratification. This longitudinal study included 121,006 adults aged ≥ 50 years from five ageing cohorts in China, Mexico, the United States, England, and multiple countries across Europe and Israel, contributing 269,146 person-wave observations with a valid immediately preceding interview. Depressive symptom risk was defined using cohort-specific Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or European Depression Scale (EURO-D) thresholds. Eight primary shocks were defined as newly recorded transitions between adjacent interviews. Cohort-specific random-intercept logistic models were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Secondary analyses examined prospective outcomes, individual components, cumulative burden, a mood-focused outcome, and meta-analytic robustness. In prospective analyses, individual health-related shocks remained associated with depressive symptom risk in lagged (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–1.43) and incident-outcome analyses (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21–1.39). Corresponding estimates for social-disruption shocks were 1.26 (1.19–1.34) and 1.19 (1.11–1.28). In the primary same-wave analysis, pooled aORs were 1.79 (1.66–1.94) for overall shocks, 1.59 (1.39–1.82) for health-related shocks, and 1.83 (1.71–1.95) for social-disruption shocks. Marital disruption, transition to living alone, and stroke had the largest component point estimates. Among observations with complete ascertainment of all eight core shock components, the aORs were 1.57 (1.50–1.64), 2.92 (2.34–3.64), and 3.92 (2.84–5.40) for one, two, and ≥ 3 shocks, respectively, compared with no shock. Incident health-related and social-disruption events were associated with elevated depressive symptom risk across five ageing cohorts, with a graded increase according to cumulative shock burden. Associations for both domains persisted in prospective analyses, with greater attenuation observed for social-disruption shocks. Together, these findings suggest that newly documented health and social transitions may serve as practical indicators for depressive-symptom assessment and follow-up during subsequent care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-30239-6
Primary Topic
Aging, Health, and Disability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incident health-related and social-disruption events, cumulative burden, and depressive symptom risk in adults aged 50 years and older: a multinational longitudinal cohort study

Xiao Yang, Chaoban Wang, Ting Dong
BMC Public Health
Aging, Health, and Disability
article

Incident health-related and social-disruption events, cumulative burden, and depressive symptom risk in adults aged 50 years and older: a multinational longitudinal cohort study

Xiao Yang, Chaoban Wang, Ting Dong
article en

Abstract

Incident health-related and social-disruption events may mark periods of heightened depressive symptom vulnerability in later life. However, cross-national evidence on their co-occurrence, component-level associations, and cumulative burden remains limited, constraining evidence-based risk stratification. This longitudinal study included 121,006 adults aged ≥ 50 years from five ageing cohorts in China, Mexico, the United States, England, and multiple countries across Europe and Israel, contributing 269,146 person-wave observations with a valid immediately preceding interview. Depressive symptom risk was defined using cohort-specific Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) or European Depression Scale (EURO-D) thresholds. Eight primary shocks were defined as newly recorded transitions between adjacent interviews. Cohort-specific random-intercept logistic models were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Secondary analyses examined prospective outcomes, individual components, cumulative burden, a mood-focused outcome, and meta-analytic robustness. In prospective analyses, individual health-related shocks remained associated with depressive symptom risk in lagged (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–1.43) and incident-outcome analyses (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21–1.39). Corresponding estimates for social-disruption shocks were 1.26 (1.19–1.34) and 1.19 (1.11–1.28). In the primary same-wave analysis, pooled aORs were 1.79 (1.66–1.94) for overall shocks, 1.59 (1.39–1.82) for health-related shocks, and 1.83 (1.71–1.95) for social-disruption shocks. Marital disruption, transition to living alone, and stroke had the largest component point estimates. Among observations with complete ascertainment of all eight core shock components, the aORs were 1.57 (1.50–1.64), 2.92 (2.34–3.64), and 3.92 (2.84–5.40) for one, two, and ≥ 3 shocks, respectively, compared with no shock. Incident health-related and social-disruption events were associated with elevated depressive symptom risk across five ageing cohorts, with a graded increase according to cumulative shock burden. Associations for both domains persisted in prospective analyses, with greater attenuation observed for social-disruption shocks. Together, these findings suggest that newly documented health and social transitions may serve as practical indicators for depressive-symptom assessment and follow-up during subsequent care.

BMC Public Health
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Qiannan Normal College For Nationalities (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Aging, Health, and Disability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon