Market Perception of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Rollbacks of U.S Public Firms

Purpose: The rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives among publicly traded United States firms has raised concerns regarding investor confidence and corporate valuation. This study examined stock market perceptions of DEI rollbacks and their implications for shareholder wealth. Methodology: The study employed a quantitative event study methodology involving 20 publicly traded United States firms that announced DEI policy rollbacks. Daily stock returns were analyzed using a mean-adjusted model, with expected returns estimated from 250 preceding trading days. Cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) were calculated over a seven-day event window (-3, +3) surrounding each announcement. Findings: The findings revealed negative average cumulative abnormal returns throughout the event window, ranging from -1.02% to -1.98%, with an average CAR of -1.66% by day +3. These findings suggest an unfavorable market reaction to DEI rollbacks, although broader market movements and pre-announcement effects cannot be excluded. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that corporate managers carefully evaluate the financial and reputational implications of reversing DEI commitments, strengthen stakeholder communication, and incorporate investor expectations into governance decisions. Future research should employ market-adjusted benchmarks and larger samples to establish more robust evidence concerning the valuation consequences of DEI policy changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economic Policy
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.4086
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Perception of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Rollbacks of U.S Public Firms

Qunfeng Liao, Joy Ouyang
International Journal of Economic Policy
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Market Perception of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Rollbacks of U.S Public Firms

Qunfeng Liao, Joy Ouyang
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives among publicly traded United States firms has raised concerns regarding investor confidence and corporate valuation. This study examined stock market perceptions of DEI rollbacks and their implications for shareholder wealth. Methodology: The study employed a quantitative event study methodology involving 20 publicly traded United States firms that announced DEI policy rollbacks. Daily stock returns were analyzed using a mean-adjusted model, with expected returns estimated from 250 preceding trading days. Cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) were calculated over a seven-day event window (-3, +3) surrounding each announcement. Findings: The findings revealed negative average cumulative abnormal returns throughout the event window, ranging from -1.02% to -1.98%, with an average CAR of -1.66% by day +3. These findings suggest an unfavorable market reaction to DEI rollbacks, although broader market movements and pre-announcement effects cannot be excluded. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that corporate managers carefully evaluate the financial and reputational implications of reversing DEI commitments, strengthen stakeholder communication, and incorporate investor expectations into governance decisions. Future research should employ market-adjusted benchmarks and larger samples to establish more robust evidence concerning the valuation consequences of DEI policy changes.

International Journal of Economic PolicyVol. 6(3)
Oakland University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon