Predicted and Documented Construction-Stage Impacts of Urban Mega Infrastructure Projects: Environmental Follow-Up, Material Circularity and Social Acceptance in Athens Metro Line 4

Urban mega infrastructure projects are justified by long-term mobility, and environmental and social benefits, yet their construction imposes pressures that are concentrated in particular neighborhoods and periods and whose magnitude is rarely quantified at the assessment stage. This study examines the relationship between anticipated and documented construction-stage impacts in Section A of Athens Metro Line 4, from Alsos Veikou to Goudi, and extends the comparison to excavation-related material flows and to the conditions of social acceptance. A qualitative case-study design analyses the environmental permitting framework, the annual environmental reports of Elliniko Metro S.A. 2021–2025, the applicable waste legislation and the relevant literature, applying an analytical sequence that links predicted pressure, documented condition, management response, residual effect, resource-recovery pathway and social relevance. The documentation confirms that management mechanisms corresponding to the anticipated pressures were in place for noise, vibration, dust, traffic and public-space occupation, although it does not allow their effectiveness to be verified quantitatively. The clearest documented outcome concerns materials, since excavation products were directed to quarry restoration, fill and cover applications and cement production, while construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arising from archaeological works and utility relocations was transferred to licensed facilities. The findings indicate that separating excavation products from C&DW is necessary for an accurate reading of project circularity and that social acceptance can be addressed only conceptually in the absence of representative survey data. The framework offers a transferable basis for construction-stage follow-up of mega infrastructure projects and waste-management facilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Research in the Mediterranean
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13052/srm2795-0514.018
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicted and Documented Construction-Stage Impacts of Urban Mega Infrastructure Projects: Environmental Follow-Up, Material Circularity and Social Acceptance in Athens Metro Line 4

Simos Tsilikas
Sustainability Research in the Mediterranean
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Predicted and Documented Construction-Stage Impacts of Urban Mega Infrastructure Projects: Environmental Follow-Up, Material Circularity and Social Acceptance in Athens Metro Line 4

Simos Tsilikas
article en

Abstract

Urban mega infrastructure projects are justified by long-term mobility, and environmental and social benefits, yet their construction imposes pressures that are concentrated in particular neighborhoods and periods and whose magnitude is rarely quantified at the assessment stage. This study examines the relationship between anticipated and documented construction-stage impacts in Section A of Athens Metro Line 4, from Alsos Veikou to Goudi, and extends the comparison to excavation-related material flows and to the conditions of social acceptance. A qualitative case-study design analyses the environmental permitting framework, the annual environmental reports of Elliniko Metro S.A. 2021–2025, the applicable waste legislation and the relevant literature, applying an analytical sequence that links predicted pressure, documented condition, management response, residual effect, resource-recovery pathway and social relevance. The documentation confirms that management mechanisms corresponding to the anticipated pressures were in place for noise, vibration, dust, traffic and public-space occupation, although it does not allow their effectiveness to be verified quantitatively. The clearest documented outcome concerns materials, since excavation products were directed to quarry restoration, fill and cover applications and cement production, while construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arising from archaeological works and utility relocations was transferred to licensed facilities. The findings indicate that separating excavation products from C&DW is necessary for an accurate reading of project circularity and that social acceptance can be addressed only conceptually in the absence of representative survey data. The framework offers a transferable basis for construction-stage follow-up of mega infrastructure projects and waste-management facilities.

Sustainability Research in the Mediterranean
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon