Coaches’ Perspectives on the Differences between 3×3 and 5×5 Basketball: Implications for Training, Tactics, and Performance

Introduction/Objective The rapid growth of 3×3 basketball as an Olympic discipline has raised questions regarding its differences from traditional 5×5 basketball. Although previous research has examined physiological and performance characteristics, coaches’ perspectives remain underexplored. This study investigated coaches’ perceptions of differences between 3×3 and 5×5 basketball in terms of physical conditioning, training structure, tactical approaches, and psychological demands. Methods A qualitative design was employed using semi-structured interviews with eleven experienced basketball coaches involved in 3×3 competitions. Twelve open-ended questions explored coaching practices, training priorities, and perceptions of both formats. Data were analyzed through Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two researchers, with disagreements resolved through consensus. Results Three themes emerged, namely physical conditioning, training structure and tactics, and psychological factors. Coaches described 3×3 as emphasizing speed, explosiveness, rapid transitions, individual technical skills, frequent pick-and-roll situations, and faster decision-making under time pressure. Conversely, 5×5 was perceived as requiring greater endurance, strength, structured team organization, coordinated offensive systems, and more complex defensive strategies. While both formats were considered competitive and entertaining, 3×3 involved greater individual responsibility and cognitive demands, whereas 5×5 emphasized teamwork and collective tactical execution. Discussion The findings indicate that 3×3 represents a distinct performance environment rather than merely a reduced version of 5×5 basketball. Conclusion Recognizing these differences may help coaches develop format-specific training programs and better prepare athletes for the physical, tactical, and psychological demands of each game.