Swallowing biomechanics and upper esophageal sphincter pressure remain altered after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer

Abstract Postoperative dysphagia is common after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer, but its long-term mechanisms remain poorly understood. This prospective study evaluated longitudinal changes in swallowing function and pressure dynamics through 6 months postoperatively. Thirteen patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. EAT-10 scores increased significantly at 1 and 3 months, while the median score remained above baseline at 6 months without reaching statistical significance. VFSS demonstrated significant reductions in laryngeal elevation distance (LED) and hyoid forward displacement at 6 months. HRM revealed a significant increase in upper esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (UES-IRP), whereas meso-hypopharyngeal contractile integral (MHPCI) was unchanged. LED was negatively correlated with UES-IRP. Additional analyses showed no significant relationships between EAT-10 and LED or UES-IRP. Exploratory regression analyses suggested an association between anastomotic stricture and higher 6 months EAT-10 scores. These findings indicate that objective biomechanical abnormalities may persist despite an unclear relationship with patient-reported symptoms, supporting multimodal assessment using subjective and objective measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-78065-5
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swallowing biomechanics and upper esophageal sphincter pressure remain altered after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer

Mari Ikenaga, Yoshihiko Kumai, Kengo Kanetaka, Sumie Takashima et al.
Scientific Reports
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Swallowing biomechanics and upper esophageal sphincter pressure remain altered after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer

Mari Ikenaga, Yoshihiko Kumai, Kengo Kanetaka, Sumie Takashima, Noriaki Makimoto, Mayuko Nakamura, Hideaki Nishi, Ayaka Mori, Junki Ono, Y. Morotomi, Kosuke Sawase, Shuntaro Soejima, Shinichiro Kobayashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Postoperative dysphagia is common after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer, but its long-term mechanisms remain poorly understood. This prospective study evaluated longitudinal changes in swallowing function and pressure dynamics through 6 months postoperatively. Thirteen patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. EAT-10 scores increased significantly at 1 and 3 months, while the median score remained above baseline at 6 months without reaching statistical significance. VFSS demonstrated significant reductions in laryngeal elevation distance (LED) and hyoid forward displacement at 6 months. HRM revealed a significant increase in upper esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (UES-IRP), whereas meso-hypopharyngeal contractile integral (MHPCI) was unchanged. LED was negatively correlated with UES-IRP. Additional analyses showed no significant relationships between EAT-10 and LED or UES-IRP. Exploratory regression analyses suggested an association between anastomotic stricture and higher 6 months EAT-10 scores. These findings indicate that objective biomechanical abnormalities may persist despite an unclear relationship with patient-reported symptoms, supporting multimodal assessment using subjective and objective measures.

Scientific Reports
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon