Contributions of Site Heterogeneity in Multi-site Brain-Phenotype Predictions
Machine learning studies of brain-phenotype associations typically summarize accuracy with a single Pearson correlation, yet in harmonized multi-site data this metric is shaped by training-set size, feature and outcome variability, and true effect heterogeneity. We analyzed structural MRI data from the Reproducible Brain Charts consortium. After preprocessing and quality control, 3486 participants from 9 sites were retained. Three training set compositions were used to understand contributions of site heterogeneity after harmonization: within-site (Local), size-downsampled multi-site (Multi-Down), and full multi-site (Multi-Full). Another site-agnostic strategy (Overall) pooled all sites into a single dataset. All strategies included the target site in the training and testing samples. These analyses separate the contribution of the site effect from that of sample size. Between-site heterogeneity was extensive (age I^2 ≈ 95%). The overall correlation of age prediction (r = 0.73) exceeded the within-site meta-analytic estimate (Multi-Full r = 0.63). The improvement of correlation in the pooled dataset was driven by a mechanical inflation from the larger outcome variance. At matched sample size, within-site training outperformed harmonized multi-site training. Increasing the multi-site training sample size did not yield a significant advantage over within-site training. The apparent advantage of cross-dataset training thus appears to reflect training-set size rather than a benefit of multi-site composition per se. The same pattern generally held for the weaker brain-p-factor signals. Together, these results indicate that between-site heterogeneity in machine learning brain-phenotype prediction persists after harmonization. We recommend reporting site-level prediction accuracy and feature dispersion and standard deviation of the outcome variable alongside any pooled estimate to improve inter-site and inter-study comparison of machine learning prediction accuracy.
Authors
- Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-9399)
- Simon Vandekar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-9073)
- Ishaan Gadiyar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8688-8983)
- Megan Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-4425)
- Andrew Chen
- Guanru Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0834-966X)
Institutions
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Published
- 2026-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.01.763540
- Primary Topic
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Type
- preprint