Democracy, participation and vulnerable groups

This paper aims to explore the issue of the participation of vulnerable groups, with particular reference to people with intellectual disabilities. Starting from an examination of the functional relationship between participation and the democratic ideal, and the challenges facing the national context, this paper outlines the model of participation introduced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), highlighting that, although the European Union has long been moving towards promoting greater participation by people with disabilities, opportunities for dialogue and the decision-making processes themselves still suffer from serious shortcomings in terms of accessibility, thereby hindering the full realisation of this right.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/32737
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democracy, participation and vulnerable groups

Giuditta Matucci
Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Democracy, participation and vulnerable groups

Giuditta Matucci
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the issue of the participation of vulnerable groups, with particular reference to people with intellectual disabilities. Starting from an examination of the functional relationship between participation and the democratic ideal, and the challenges facing the national context, this paper outlines the model of participation introduced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), highlighting that, although the European Union has long been moving towards promoting greater participation by people with disabilities, opportunities for dialogue and the decision-making processes themselves still suffer from serious shortcomings in terms of accessibility, thereby hindering the full realisation of this right.

Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)Vol. 8(2)
University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon