TANF and Black Fatherhood: A Critical Historical Policy Analysis of Family Responsibility

Abstract Objective To examine how Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) policy defines family responsibility and shapes Black father involvement. Background TANF’s emphasis on employment, marriage, and financial provision reflects historical regulation of Black families and may overlook fathers’ relational contributions. Methods A qualitative critical historical policy analysis informed by Critical Race Theory, strengths-based perspective, and Africana-centered scholarship examined TANF’s design and implementation alongside existing empirical evidence. Results The analysis identified tensions between family-stability objectives and restrictive eligibility, sanctions, administrative discretion, and child-support enforcement. Existing evidence documents racial disparities in access and administration, while policy definitions inadequately recognize multidimensional father involvement. Conclusion TANF can reinforce racialized constructions of responsibility and constrain conditions supporting Black father involvement. Recommendations: Reforms should strengthen benefit adequacy, equitable administration, child-support pass-through policies, realistic support orders, and culturally responsive services recognizing caregiving and co-parenting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11332587/v1
Primary Topic
Social Policies and Family
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

TANF and Black Fatherhood: A Critical Historical Policy Analysis of Family Responsibility

Felicia Law Murray, Brandie Bentley, Ashley A. Sanders, J. Dontaè Roberts
Research Square
Social Policies and Family
preprint

TANF and Black Fatherhood: A Critical Historical Policy Analysis of Family Responsibility

Felicia Law Murray, Brandie Bentley, Ashley A. Sanders, J. Dontaè Roberts
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine how Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) policy defines family responsibility and shapes Black father involvement. Background TANF’s emphasis on employment, marriage, and financial provision reflects historical regulation of Black families and may overlook fathers’ relational contributions. Methods A qualitative critical historical policy analysis informed by Critical Race Theory, strengths-based perspective, and Africana-centered scholarship examined TANF’s design and implementation alongside existing empirical evidence. Results The analysis identified tensions between family-stability objectives and restrictive eligibility, sanctions, administrative discretion, and child-support enforcement. Existing evidence documents racial disparities in access and administration, while policy definitions inadequately recognize multidimensional father involvement. Conclusion TANF can reinforce racialized constructions of responsibility and constrain conditions supporting Black father involvement. Recommendations: Reforms should strengthen benefit adequacy, equitable administration, child-support pass-through policies, realistic support orders, and culturally responsive services recognizing caregiving and co-parenting.

Research Square
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University of Michigan (US), Saginaw Valley State University (US), Tarleton State University (US)
Social Policies and Family
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon