Audience Discernment of AI-Generated Media Content: A Systematic Review

Despite the growing prevalence of AI-generated content in the media industry, media research has largely focused on specific aspects, such as measuring communicators' attitudes and perceptions toward the use of this emerging technology. Research examining audiences and their ability to discern AI-generated content remains limited. Accordingly, this study aims to examine audiences' ability to discern AI-generated media content. The study employs a systematic review methodology, reviewing 19 studies based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria within the Participants, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. The study identified several key findings. Most notably, audiences can distinguish AI-generated content through a range of technical and statistical indicators, including probabilistic and predictive indicators, digital watermarking, pixel prediction, and blockchain technologies. Recognizing these indicators requires audiences to possess an adequate level of technical knowledge and expertise. In addition, media and journalistic literacy, together with transparency and disclosure practices and linguistic indicators, can assist audiences in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-generated content. Regarding the methodological approaches adopted in previous research, the review found that studies on this topic primarily focus on issues of trust, credibility, and transparency in AI-generated content. It also revealed that questionnaires, whether electronic or paper-based, are the most commonly used data collection instrument. Furthermore, individuals constituted the most frequently studied sample, and the review highlighted the diversity of theoretical frameworks employed across the included studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Journal of Communication Studies
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71220/2790-5616.1108
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audience Discernment of AI-Generated Media Content: A Systematic Review

Safaa Al-Abrawi
Middle East Journal of Communication Studies
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Audience Discernment of AI-Generated Media Content: A Systematic Review

Safaa Al-Abrawi
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing prevalence of AI-generated content in the media industry, media research has largely focused on specific aspects, such as measuring communicators' attitudes and perceptions toward the use of this emerging technology. Research examining audiences and their ability to discern AI-generated content remains limited. Accordingly, this study aims to examine audiences' ability to discern AI-generated media content. The study employs a systematic review methodology, reviewing 19 studies based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria within the Participants, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. The study identified several key findings. Most notably, audiences can distinguish AI-generated content through a range of technical and statistical indicators, including probabilistic and predictive indicators, digital watermarking, pixel prediction, and blockchain technologies. Recognizing these indicators requires audiences to possess an adequate level of technical knowledge and expertise. In addition, media and journalistic literacy, together with transparency and disclosure practices and linguistic indicators, can assist audiences in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-generated content. Regarding the methodological approaches adopted in previous research, the review found that studies on this topic primarily focus on issues of trust, credibility, and transparency in AI-generated content. It also revealed that questionnaires, whether electronic or paper-based, are the most commonly used data collection instrument. Furthermore, individuals constituted the most frequently studied sample, and the review highlighted the diversity of theoretical frameworks employed across the included studies.

Middle East Journal of Communication StudiesVol. 6(2)
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon