“Who Runs Honduras?” Evaluating the Political Reach of the Ten Families

During the early twentieth century, Honduras experienced a surge in immigration. Many immigrant families went on to commercialize underdeveloped industries in the country, and accumulated substantial wealth by relying on one another to establish strong networks and strategic alliances, expanding their businesses and ultimately becoming the country's dominant economic elites. As their economic power grew, so too did the perception that they wielded political influence. By 2009, during the democratic destabilization marked by the removal of President Manuel Zelaya, the ten families were widely blamed for orchestrating the coup, fueled by claims that they acted to protect their private interests. However, the idea that these families have controlled the country's political workings lacks definitive evidence and is largely perception-based, especially given that few family members have held formal government positions. This thesis evaluates the historical events that shaped the perception of the ten families as a dominant political force and argues that this narrative no longer holds as strongly today, as emerging political factions compete with the ten families for governmental control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/n6de-eb83
Primary Topic
Politics and Society in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Who Runs Honduras?” Evaluating the Political Reach of the Ten Families

Catherine Ferro Manzanares
Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Politics and Society in Latin America
article

“Who Runs Honduras?” Evaluating the Political Reach of the Ten Families

Catherine Ferro Manzanares
article en

Abstract

During the early twentieth century, Honduras experienced a surge in immigration. Many immigrant families went on to commercialize underdeveloped industries in the country, and accumulated substantial wealth by relying on one another to establish strong networks and strategic alliances, expanding their businesses and ultimately becoming the country's dominant economic elites. As their economic power grew, so too did the perception that they wielded political influence. By 2009, during the democratic destabilization marked by the removal of President Manuel Zelaya, the ten families were widely blamed for orchestrating the coup, fueled by claims that they acted to protect their private interests. However, the idea that these families have controlled the country's political workings lacks definitive evidence and is largely perception-based, especially given that few family members have held formal government positions. This thesis evaluates the historical events that shaped the perception of the ten families as a dominant political force and argues that this narrative no longer holds as strongly today, as emerging political factions compete with the ten families for governmental control.

Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Politics and Society in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon