A single day of natural daylight exposure and physical activity does not conclusively change circadian phase: A Bayesian crossover experiment

Among the environmental signals that shape human physiology, the daily light-dark cycle is the primary zeitgeber of the human circadian system. Physical activity may provide an additional non-photic time cue and frequently co-occurs with daylight in everyday life. However, their independent and combined effects on circadian phase have rarely been disentangled under naturalistic daylight conditions. In a counterbalanced mixed-design experiment, 41 healthy adults (24 women; mean age = 23.7 years, SD = 4.3) participated in up to three 40-h visits on fixed individual sleep-wake schedules. Each visit comprised an 8-h exposure beginning 1.5 h after wake to natural daylight, daylight attenuated by amber-tinted glasses, or indoor electric light (within subjects; mean photopic illuminances: 1196, 460, and 75 lx), with otherwise dim-light conditions. Participants hiked for approximately 4 h or remained sedentary (between subjects; activity indexed by median heart rate reserve [HRR]; group means: 32.7% and 2.7%). Bayesian hierarchical models used individual photopic illuminance (ActTrust 2) and median HRR to predict change in dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO; primary outcome) and exploratory outcomes (daytime and evening sleepiness, mood, and wellbeing, daytime perceived exertion, and evening psychomotor vigilance). Per standard-deviation increase in log-transformed illuminance and median HRR, estimated DLMO changes were −4.22 min (95% HDI [−10.93, 2.22]; BF₁₀ = 0.70) and −6.48 min (95% HDI [−13.79, 1.27], BF₁₀ = 1.56), respectively. Evidence remained inconclusive for both predictors and their interaction. Exploratory findings were largely inconclusive, practically negligible, or favoured the absence of effects. The circadian effects of a single day of natural daylight exposure, with or without physical activity, therefore remain unclear. Resolving this question may require larger samples and brighter, repeated, or habitual exposure timed to phases of greater circadian light sensitivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.03.763886
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A single day of natural daylight exposure and physical activity does not conclusively change circadian phase: A Bayesian crossover experiment

Christine Blume, Undine Emmi Lang, Arno Schmidt‐Trucksäss, Corrado Garbazza et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
preprint

A single day of natural daylight exposure and physical activity does not conclusively change circadian phase: A Bayesian crossover experiment

Christine Blume, Undine Emmi Lang, Arno Schmidt‐Trucksäss, Corrado Garbazza, Fabian Schwendinger, Marta Milanesi, Ann-Sophie Loock
preprint en

Abstract

Among the environmental signals that shape human physiology, the daily light-dark cycle is the primary zeitgeber of the human circadian system. Physical activity may provide an additional non-photic time cue and frequently co-occurs with daylight in everyday life. However, their independent and combined effects on circadian phase have rarely been disentangled under naturalistic daylight conditions. In a counterbalanced mixed-design experiment, 41 healthy adults (24 women; mean age = 23.7 years, SD = 4.3) participated in up to three 40-h visits on fixed individual sleep-wake schedules. Each visit comprised an 8-h exposure beginning 1.5 h after wake to natural daylight, daylight attenuated by amber-tinted glasses, or indoor electric light (within subjects; mean photopic illuminances: 1196, 460, and 75 lx), with otherwise dim-light conditions. Participants hiked for approximately 4 h or remained sedentary (between subjects; activity indexed by median heart rate reserve [HRR]; group means: 32.7% and 2.7%). Bayesian hierarchical models used individual photopic illuminance (ActTrust 2) and median HRR to predict change in dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO; primary outcome) and exploratory outcomes (daytime and evening sleepiness, mood, and wellbeing, daytime perceived exertion, and evening psychomotor vigilance). Per standard-deviation increase in log-transformed illuminance and median HRR, estimated DLMO changes were −4.22 min (95% HDI [−10.93, 2.22]; BF₁₀ = 0.70) and −6.48 min (95% HDI [−13.79, 1.27], BF₁₀ = 1.56), respectively. Evidence remained inconclusive for both predictors and their interaction. Exploratory findings were largely inconclusive, practically negligible, or favoured the absence of effects. The circadian effects of a single day of natural daylight exposure, with or without physical activity, therefore remain unclear. Resolving this question may require larger samples and brighter, repeated, or habitual exposure timed to phases of greater circadian light sensitivity.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Basel (CH), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel (CH)
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon