Forget‐Me‐Not: Evaluation of a Post Hospital Antipsychotic Deprescribing Intervention in Dementia and Delirium

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a joint hospital pharmacist and medical physician deprescribing intervention on antipsychotic cessation and/or dose reduction 12 weeks post hospital discharge. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a Victorian metropolitan hospital network. Patients discharged from General Medicine, with delirium or dementia and prescribed at least one antipsychotic were eligible. The control group (July to November 2021) received written information about antipsychotic use in dementia and/or delirium. The intervention group (May to December 2022) received the same written information and a pharmacist/physician antipsychotic review after hospital discharge. Deprescribing recommendations were communicated to General Practitioners (GPs) for consideration and action. Antipsychotic prescription was recorded at 12 weeks post-discharge. RESULTS: Sixty-two per cent of control group patients (n = 81) and 75% of intervention group patients (n = 77) were alive at the 12-week follow-up. For surviving patients, there was no difference in complete antipsychotic cessation between groups (32% control vs. 17% intervention, p = 0.07); however, the control group had greater total dose reduction (42% vs. 17%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The intervention did not reduce antipsychotic prescription at 12 weeks, compared to standard care. Rather, on the outcome of antipsychotic dose reduction, standard care was better. These were unexpected findings. Differences in clinical diagnosis and specific antipsychotic prescribed may be confounding factors, warranting further analysis. A negative outcome is important to report as new practices should have robust evidence before consideration for wider implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal on Ageing
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70245
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forget‐Me‐Not: Evaluation of a Post Hospital Antipsychotic Deprescribing Intervention in Dementia and Delirium

Mahesan Anpalahan, Paul Wembridge, Stephanie Gibson, Cathy Ngo et al.
Australian Journal on Ageing
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Forget‐Me‐Not: Evaluation of a Post Hospital Antipsychotic Deprescribing Intervention in Dementia and Delirium

Mahesan Anpalahan, Paul Wembridge, Stephanie Gibson, Cathy Ngo, Ken GW Teo, Rohith Valsalan, Emily Schembri, Gary S Yip, Hiba Ali
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a joint hospital pharmacist and medical physician deprescribing intervention on antipsychotic cessation and/or dose reduction 12 weeks post hospital discharge. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a Victorian metropolitan hospital network. Patients discharged from General Medicine, with delirium or dementia and prescribed at least one antipsychotic were eligible. The control group (July to November 2021) received written information about antipsychotic use in dementia and/or delirium. The intervention group (May to December 2022) received the same written information and a pharmacist/physician antipsychotic review after hospital discharge. Deprescribing recommendations were communicated to General Practitioners (GPs) for consideration and action. Antipsychotic prescription was recorded at 12 weeks post-discharge. RESULTS: Sixty-two per cent of control group patients (n = 81) and 75% of intervention group patients (n = 77) were alive at the 12-week follow-up. For surviving patients, there was no difference in complete antipsychotic cessation between groups (32% control vs. 17% intervention, p = 0.07); however, the control group had greater total dose reduction (42% vs. 17%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The intervention did not reduce antipsychotic prescription at 12 weeks, compared to standard care. Rather, on the outcome of antipsychotic dose reduction, standard care was better. These were unexpected findings. Differences in clinical diagnosis and specific antipsychotic prescribed may be confounding factors, warranting further analysis. A negative outcome is important to report as new practices should have robust evidence before consideration for wider implementation.

Australian Journal on AgeingVol. 45(4)
Eastern Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon