The Geopolitics of U.S.–Iran Confrontation: Structural Deterrence, Asymmetric Warfare, and Regional Order

This study examines the geopolitical dynamics governing military and diplomatic confrontation between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Integrating neo-realist balance-of-power theory with asymmetric deterrence frameworks, the paper evaluates structural drivers of conflict: Tehran’s forward-defense doctrine, Washington’s regional maritime hegemony, the weaponization of economic sanctions, and the systemic vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz. By examining operational mechanisms—such as the "Axis of Resistance" proxy architecture, anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) envelopes, and counter-value economic disruption—this paper illustrates why conventional military superiority struggles to yield decisive strategic outcomes in modern regional theaters. Finally, it assesses the multipolar dimension of the conflict, tracing how strategic hedging by China and Russia transforms Persian Gulf stability into a critical node of twenty-first-century great-power rivalry.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23939739
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Geopolitics of U.S.–Iran Confrontation: Structural Deterrence, Asymmetric Warfare, and Regional Order

Dr.M.Senthilrajkumar, Dr. R. Muthusubramanian
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Geopolitics of U.S.–Iran Confrontation: Structural Deterrence, Asymmetric Warfare, and Regional Order

Dr.M.Senthilrajkumar, Dr. R. Muthusubramanian
article en

Abstract

This study examines the geopolitical dynamics governing military and diplomatic confrontation between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Integrating neo-realist balance-of-power theory with asymmetric deterrence frameworks, the paper evaluates structural drivers of conflict: Tehran’s forward-defense doctrine, Washington’s regional maritime hegemony, the weaponization of economic sanctions, and the systemic vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz. By examining operational mechanisms—such as the "Axis of Resistance" proxy architecture, anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) envelopes, and counter-value economic disruption—this paper illustrates why conventional military superiority struggles to yield decisive strategic outcomes in modern regional theaters. Finally, it assesses the multipolar dimension of the conflict, tracing how strategic hedging by China and Russia transforms Persian Gulf stability into a critical node of twenty-first-century great-power rivalry.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Geopolitics of U.S.–Iran Confrontation: Structural Deterrence, Asymmetric Warfare, and Regional Order — Dr.M.Senthilrajkumar, Dr. R. Muthusubramanian · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS