Technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries: A two‑way fixed effects difference‑in‑differences analysis

Understanding how technological progress unfolds across advanced and emerging economies remains central to both innovation research and development policy. This study compares the trajectories of technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries using a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (DID) framework over the period 1995–2023. The analysis focuses on three core indicators: mobile cellular subscriptions, internet usage, and patent applications, and is supported by an extensive set of diagnostic checks, including partial R² contributions, residual normality and heteroskedasticity tests, and Ramsey RESET tests. Despite historically higher levels of connectivity and innovation in OECD countries, the estimated results indicate a relative slowdown in growth rates for mobile subscriptions, internet adoption, and patenting activity, with negative and statistically significant coefficients across specifications with and without control variables. On the other hand, BRICS countries show steady progress in all three outcomes, often rapid, catch‑up. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about the persistence of technological leadership in advanced economies and suggest that emerging economies are increasingly shaping global patterns of technology adoption and innovation. The results emphasize the necessity of policy frameworks that recognize heterogeneous pathways of technological progress and support both diffusion and innovation in a changing global economic landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347936
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries: A two‑way fixed effects difference‑in‑differences analysis

Hailu Kendie Addis, Amsalu K. Addis, Lipeng Chen
PLoS ONE
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

Technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries: A two‑way fixed effects difference‑in‑differences analysis

Hailu Kendie Addis, Amsalu K. Addis, Lipeng Chen
article en

Abstract

Understanding how technological progress unfolds across advanced and emerging economies remains central to both innovation research and development policy. This study compares the trajectories of technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries using a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (DID) framework over the period 1995–2023. The analysis focuses on three core indicators: mobile cellular subscriptions, internet usage, and patent applications, and is supported by an extensive set of diagnostic checks, including partial R² contributions, residual normality and heteroskedasticity tests, and Ramsey RESET tests. Despite historically higher levels of connectivity and innovation in OECD countries, the estimated results indicate a relative slowdown in growth rates for mobile subscriptions, internet adoption, and patenting activity, with negative and statistically significant coefficients across specifications with and without control variables. On the other hand, BRICS countries show steady progress in all three outcomes, often rapid, catch‑up. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about the persistence of technological leadership in advanced economies and suggest that emerging economies are increasingly shaping global patterns of technology adoption and innovation. The results emphasize the necessity of policy frameworks that recognize heterogeneous pathways of technological progress and support both diffusion and innovation in a changing global economic landscape.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
Nanchang University (CN), Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ET), Hanjiang Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon