Generative AI and Unequal Englishes in ELT: From Algorithmic Gatekeeping to Critical Algorithmic Language Awareness

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increasingly shapes everyday judgements about English in language education by producing, recommending, evaluating, and normalizing forms presented as correct, natural, professional, intelligible, or credible. Viewed through Unequal Englishes (UE), this growing authority matters because GenAI operates within institutions where Englishes already carry unequal legitimacy and value. This conceptual article proposes Critical Algorithmic Language Awareness (CALA) as a pedagogical response to algorithmic linguistic gatekeeping. CALA develops learners’, teachers’, and institutions’ capacity to examine whose linguistic values models privilege and to make contextually defensible decisions about accepting, modifying, or resisting algorithmic recommendations. The article identifies four forms of gatekeeping that motivate CALA: algorithmic standardization, linguistic self-repair, pragmatic and cultural normalization, and evaluative surveillance. Together, these mechanisms show how GenAI may reproduce linguistic inequality while creating opportunities for critical inquiry. ELT therefore needs to govern algorithmic linguistic authority while preserving informed, situated human agency in teaching and assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Changing English
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2026.2756342
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and Unequal Englishes in ELT: From Algorithmic Gatekeeping to Critical Algorithmic Language Awareness

Veronico N. Tarrayo
Changing English
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Generative AI and Unequal Englishes in ELT: From Algorithmic Gatekeeping to Critical Algorithmic Language Awareness

Veronico N. Tarrayo
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increasingly shapes everyday judgements about English in language education by producing, recommending, evaluating, and normalizing forms presented as correct, natural, professional, intelligible, or credible. Viewed through Unequal Englishes (UE), this growing authority matters because GenAI operates within institutions where Englishes already carry unequal legitimacy and value. This conceptual article proposes Critical Algorithmic Language Awareness (CALA) as a pedagogical response to algorithmic linguistic gatekeeping. CALA develops learners’, teachers’, and institutions’ capacity to examine whose linguistic values models privilege and to make contextually defensible decisions about accepting, modifying, or resisting algorithmic recommendations. The article identifies four forms of gatekeeping that motivate CALA: algorithmic standardization, linguistic self-repair, pragmatic and cultural normalization, and evaluative surveillance. Together, these mechanisms show how GenAI may reproduce linguistic inequality while creating opportunities for critical inquiry. ELT therefore needs to govern algorithmic linguistic authority while preserving informed, situated human agency in teaching and assessment.

Changing English
University of Santo Tomas (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon