History-Dependent Response, Predictive Transfer, and Limits of Identifiability: Failure-Preserving Mathematical and Experimental Benchmarks from C19 to P92 Steel

A failure-preserving synthesis of a finite C19 boundary-history model, retrospective cantilever tests, and P92 steel creep-fatigue data from three independent specimens. We distinguish (i) forward history causality, (ii) external state/parameter identifiability, and (iii) added prospective predictive value over properly calibrated conventional models. A conventional two-branch generalized Maxwell baseline reached within-specimen RF NRMSE 0.02224; C19 noisy/unknown-gain readout and E9A/E9D/E9G joint transfer gates failed. Slow conventional modes improved separately calibrated long-time tails but a shared parameter test failed. No BIG-specific physical incremental prediction was established, and B42 SCIENCE NONE is retained. This record contains the English preprint, Japanese reference translation, and an author-generated protocol/code/audit supplement. Original BAM/Bristol source datasets are NOT redistributed; cite their originators. Unreviewed author preprint. No independently replicated physical experiment or full independent end-to-end software rerun. Manuscript revision 2026-11-05. English authoritative, Japanese reference translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23965485
Primary Topic
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

History-Dependent Response, Predictive Transfer, and Limits of Identifiability: Failure-Preserving Mathematical and Experimental Benchmarks from C19 to P92 Steel

Jun Lucis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
preprint

History-Dependent Response, Predictive Transfer, and Limits of Identifiability: Failure-Preserving Mathematical and Experimental Benchmarks from C19 to P92 Steel

Jun Lucis
preprint en

Abstract

A failure-preserving synthesis of a finite C19 boundary-history model, retrospective cantilever tests, and P92 steel creep-fatigue data from three independent specimens. We distinguish (i) forward history causality, (ii) external state/parameter identifiability, and (iii) added prospective predictive value over properly calibrated conventional models. A conventional two-branch generalized Maxwell baseline reached within-specimen RF NRMSE 0.02224; C19 noisy/unknown-gain readout and E9A/E9D/E9G joint transfer gates failed. Slow conventional modes improved separately calibrated long-time tails but a shared parameter test failed. No BIG-specific physical incremental prediction was established, and B42 SCIENCE NONE is retained. This record contains the English preprint, Japanese reference translation, and an author-generated protocol/code/audit supplement. Original BAM/Bristol source datasets are NOT redistributed; cite their originators. Unreviewed author preprint. No independently replicated physical experiment or full independent end-to-end software rerun. Manuscript revision 2026-11-05. English authoritative, Japanese reference translation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
History-Dependent Response, Predictive Transfer, and Limits of Identifiability: Failure-Preserving Mathematical and Experimental Benchmarks from C19 to P92 Steel — Jun Lucis · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS