Postoperative pain following epidural local anaesthetic bolus administration after lumbar fusion: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Background Postoperative pain remains a serious concern after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Intraoperative epidural boluses of local anaesthetics (LA) have been proposed to reduce postoperative pain, but evidence is inconsistent. This study evaluated the association between an epidural bolus and pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) following PLIF. Methods A retrospective study was conducted including 147 PLIF patients. Patients were divided into the bolus ( n = 80) or control group ( n = 67) based on whether an epidural LA bolus was administered at the end of surgery. Primary outcomes: static (in rest) and dynamic (in movement) pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) in the PACU. Secondary outcomes: ward NRS, opioid consumption (Morphine Milligram Equivalents, MME), PACU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and analgesia- and surgery-related complications within 1 month. The multivariable regression models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, preoperative opioid use, previous spinal surgery, and screw trajectory. Results The groups were similar in age and sex, but differed in BMI, ASA classification, prior spinal surgery, and screw trajectory. Primary outcome : No significant differences were observed in static (Mann–Whitney U = 2439.0, p = 0.60) or dynamic (Mann–Whitney U = 1944.5, p = 0.48) NRS in the PACU. After adjustments, both static (MD -0.28, 95% CI -1.42 to 0.87, p = 0.63) and dynamic NRS (MD -0.51, 95% CI -1.69 to 0.67, p = 0.39) remained similar. Secondary outcomes : Ward NRS and opioid consumption in the PACU did not differ, but MME/hour on postoperative day 1 was lower in the bolus group (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.11, p = 0.004). PACU LOS, hospital LOS, and analgesia-related complications were similar. Surgery-related complications < 1 month were not increased in the bolus group. Conclusions This retrospective study found no association between epidural LA bolus administration and lower postoperative pain or opioid consumption in the PACU after PLIF. However, secondary analyses suggested lower opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Neurochirurgica
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-026-07070-4
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative pain following epidural local anaesthetic bolus administration after lumbar fusion: a retrospective analysis

Katalin Tamási, Marko Sahinovic, Allart M. Venema, Jos M. A. Kuijlen et al.
Acta Neurochirurgica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Postoperative pain following epidural local anaesthetic bolus administration after lumbar fusion: a retrospective analysis

Katalin Tamási, Marko Sahinovic, Allart M. Venema, Jos M. A. Kuijlen, J. Marc C. van Dijk, Anne E.H. Broekema, H. L. Li, D. E. J. Franken
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative pain remains a serious concern after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Intraoperative epidural boluses of local anaesthetics (LA) have been proposed to reduce postoperative pain, but evidence is inconsistent. This study evaluated the association between an epidural bolus and pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) following PLIF. Methods A retrospective study was conducted including 147 PLIF patients. Patients were divided into the bolus ( n = 80) or control group ( n = 67) based on whether an epidural LA bolus was administered at the end of surgery. Primary outcomes: static (in rest) and dynamic (in movement) pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) in the PACU. Secondary outcomes: ward NRS, opioid consumption (Morphine Milligram Equivalents, MME), PACU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and analgesia- and surgery-related complications within 1 month. The multivariable regression models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, preoperative opioid use, previous spinal surgery, and screw trajectory. Results The groups were similar in age and sex, but differed in BMI, ASA classification, prior spinal surgery, and screw trajectory. Primary outcome : No significant differences were observed in static (Mann–Whitney U = 2439.0, p = 0.60) or dynamic (Mann–Whitney U = 1944.5, p = 0.48) NRS in the PACU. After adjustments, both static (MD -0.28, 95% CI -1.42 to 0.87, p = 0.63) and dynamic NRS (MD -0.51, 95% CI -1.69 to 0.67, p = 0.39) remained similar. Secondary outcomes : Ward NRS and opioid consumption in the PACU did not differ, but MME/hour on postoperative day 1 was lower in the bolus group (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.11, p = 0.004). PACU LOS, hospital LOS, and analgesia-related complications were similar. Surgery-related complications < 1 month were not increased in the bolus group. Conclusions This retrospective study found no association between epidural LA bolus administration and lower postoperative pain or opioid consumption in the PACU after PLIF. However, secondary analyses suggested lower opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.

Acta Neurochirurgica
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon