Baseline cognition accounts for most predictive information on cognitive recovery during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide poisoning

Background Cognitive change during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning may differ from prognosis at acute presentation. We examined whether information recorded in a rehabilitation pathway added predictive information beyond baseline cognition. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort included 200 patients who completed 30 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) sessions and serial cognitive assessments between January 1, 2018, and January 31, 2026. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were assessed before rTMS and after 20 and 30 sessions. A MoCA increase of at least 5 points was the study-defined classification outcome; this threshold has not been validated for CO poisoning. Four exploratory algorithms were evaluated against a baseline-cognition benchmark. Performance was estimated from stratified five-fold out-of-fold predictions, with paired bootstrap comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. Results MMSE increased from 23.73 ± 2.85 to 27.83 ± 2.15 and MoCA from 21.58 ± 3.57 to 27.02 ± 2.78 after 30 sessions (both p < 0.001); 137 patients (68.5%) met the classification criterion. The baseline-cognition-only random forest had an AUC of 0.836 (95% CI 0.758–0.905) and a Brier score of 0.122, compared with 0.860 (95% CI 0.798–0.908) and 0.119 for the expanded model. Neither the paired AUC difference (0.024, 95% CI − 0.013 to 0.064; p = 0.219) nor Brier-score improvement (0.003, 95% CI − 0.008 to 0.014; p = 0.581) was statistically detectable. Conclusion Baseline cognition dominated prediction of a score-change outcome that is mathematically linked to baseline and constrained by ceiling effects. The additional routine measures and coarse imaging categories available here showed no detectable incremental value. These preliminary findings describe selected rehabilitation completers and require external validation before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1975750
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseline cognition accounts for most predictive information on cognitive recovery during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide poisoning

Peihui Liu, Mingxing Teng, Fei Yi
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Baseline cognition accounts for most predictive information on cognitive recovery during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide poisoning

Peihui Liu, Mingxing Teng, Fei Yi
article en

Abstract

Background Cognitive change during rehabilitation after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning may differ from prognosis at acute presentation. We examined whether information recorded in a rehabilitation pathway added predictive information beyond baseline cognition. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort included 200 patients who completed 30 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) sessions and serial cognitive assessments between January 1, 2018, and January 31, 2026. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were assessed before rTMS and after 20 and 30 sessions. A MoCA increase of at least 5 points was the study-defined classification outcome; this threshold has not been validated for CO poisoning. Four exploratory algorithms were evaluated against a baseline-cognition benchmark. Performance was estimated from stratified five-fold out-of-fold predictions, with paired bootstrap comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. Results MMSE increased from 23.73 ± 2.85 to 27.83 ± 2.15 and MoCA from 21.58 ± 3.57 to 27.02 ± 2.78 after 30 sessions (both p < 0.001); 137 patients (68.5%) met the classification criterion. The baseline-cognition-only random forest had an AUC of 0.836 (95% CI 0.758–0.905) and a Brier score of 0.122, compared with 0.860 (95% CI 0.798–0.908) and 0.119 for the expanded model. Neither the paired AUC difference (0.024, 95% CI − 0.013 to 0.064; p = 0.219) nor Brier-score improvement (0.003, 95% CI − 0.008 to 0.014; p = 0.581) was statistically detectable. Conclusion Baseline cognition dominated prediction of a score-change outcome that is mathematically linked to baseline and constrained by ceiling effects. The additional routine measures and coarse imaging categories available here showed no detectable incremental value. These preliminary findings describe selected rehabilitation completers and require external validation before clinical application.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 20
Shenyang Ninth People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon