Coordinated optimization of timetabling, skip-stopping, and passenger flow control with passenger loss

Peak-hour congestion constrains operational efficiency and travel experience, motivating coordinated timetabling and flow control to balance train occupancy and passenger demand. However, stricter flow control can alleviate platform crowding but prolong outside-station waiting, potentially causing passenger loss that remains underexplored. This study jointly optimizes timetabling, skip-stopping, and flow control to minimize waiting time and probabilistically modeled passenger loss. The problem is formulated as an event-driven Markov decision process with hybrid discrete-continuous actions. An adaptive parameterized deep Q-network (APDQN) is developed with a risk-aware action selection, where infeasible actions are excluded and operational risk guides exploration and exploitation. Chengdu metro case studies show coordinated control better balances waiting time and passenger loss than flow control alone or combined train-side control. GA remains competitive in small and medium cases, whereas APDQN achieves better solution quality in large case. Comparisons with DQN, ADQN, and PDQN demonstrate benefits of hybrid actions and risk-aware selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Letters
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2026.2756491
Primary Topic
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordinated optimization of timetabling, skip-stopping, and passenger flow control with passenger loss

Pan Jinshan, Xia Zhao, Shaoquan Ni, Zirui Yin et al.
Transportation Letters
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
article

Coordinated optimization of timetabling, skip-stopping, and passenger flow control with passenger loss

Pan Jinshan, Xia Zhao, Shaoquan Ni, Zirui Yin, Xin Wang, Yuhua Yang
article en

Abstract

Peak-hour congestion constrains operational efficiency and travel experience, motivating coordinated timetabling and flow control to balance train occupancy and passenger demand. However, stricter flow control can alleviate platform crowding but prolong outside-station waiting, potentially causing passenger loss that remains underexplored. This study jointly optimizes timetabling, skip-stopping, and flow control to minimize waiting time and probabilistically modeled passenger loss. The problem is formulated as an event-driven Markov decision process with hybrid discrete-continuous actions. An adaptive parameterized deep Q-network (APDQN) is developed with a risk-aware action selection, where infeasible actions are excluded and operational risk guides exploration and exploitation. Chengdu metro case studies show coordinated control better balances waiting time and passenger loss than flow control alone or combined train-side control. GA remains competitive in small and medium cases, whereas APDQN achieves better solution quality in large case. Comparisons with DQN, ADQN, and PDQN demonstrate benefits of hybrid actions and risk-aware selection.

Transportation Letters
Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Coordinated optimization of timetabling, skip-stopping, and passenger flow control with passenger loss — Pan Jinshan, Xia Zhao, et al. · Transportation Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS