Fire disturbance drives depth-dependent soil organic carbon loss and recovery in a cold temperate forest: interactions with land-use transitions and stand structure

Abstract Background Wildfire is a primary disturbance controlling soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in cold temperate forests. However, depth-dependent fire effects are rarely evaluated together with land-use transitions and forest stand structure within a single process framework, limiting fire–carbon management in northern forests. Methods In Yakeshi City, western Greater Khingan Mountains, China, we integrated fire records (2000–2023), multi-temporal land use/cover data, 91 soil profiles (0–100 cm), remote-sensing stand classification, and plot surveys. Fire intensity × recovery-time effects were tested using two-way ANOVA. Carbon-loss rates were compared across fire intensities and frequencies. Land-use transition effects on 0–30 cm SOCD and stand-structure controls were quantified using ANOVA and generalized linear models (GLMs). Results Fire was the strongest near-surface carbon-loss process. Fire intensity, recovery time, and their interaction significantly affected stratified SOCD ( P < 0.05). Severe fires caused the largest losses, mainly in 0–40 cm soils. One year after fire, 0–100 cm SOCD declined by approximately 27.5%; after 5 and 10 years it recovered to approximately 87.2% and 94.9% of pre-fire levels, yet severe-burn sites remained approximately 8.7% below unburned references after a decade. Single-fire 0–100 cm loss rates ranged from 13.8% to 41.3% and increased with intensity; sites burned ≥ 3 times lost approximately 35.7%. Forest-to-cropland, forest-to-grassland, and forest-to-unused-land transitions reduced 0–30 cm SOCD by 34.8%, 22.7%, and 17.4%, whereas cropland-to-forest conversion increased SOCD by 12.8%. Larix gmelinii had the highest 0–100 cm SOCD (4.21 kg m⁻²), followed by Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (3.83 kg m⁻²). GLMs showed that dominant species, stand density, and canopy closure significantly regulated SOCD; a 10% increase in canopy closure was associated with + 1.09 kg m⁻² in 0–100 cm SOCD. Conclusions In this cold temperate forest landscape, fire attributes shape the depth and persistence of SOCD loss and recovery, while land-use transitions and stand structure modify carbon baselines and within-forest retention. Reducing high-severity short-interval reburns, limiting forest conversion, and maintaining structurally stable coniferous stands are process-consistent priorities for soil carbon conservation, within the constraints of the chronosequence sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10566139/v1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Fire disturbance drives depth-dependent soil organic carbon loss and recovery in a cold temperate forest: interactions with land-use transitions and stand structure

Pei Zhou, Xinyuan Du, Xiaoyu Wu, Liyuan Wang et al.
Research Square
Fire effects on ecosystems
preprint

Fire disturbance drives depth-dependent soil organic carbon loss and recovery in a cold temperate forest: interactions with land-use transitions and stand structure

Pei Zhou, Xinyuan Du, Xiaoyu Wu, Liyuan Wang, Jun Guo, Jie Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Wildfire is a primary disturbance controlling soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in cold temperate forests. However, depth-dependent fire effects are rarely evaluated together with land-use transitions and forest stand structure within a single process framework, limiting fire–carbon management in northern forests. Methods In Yakeshi City, western Greater Khingan Mountains, China, we integrated fire records (2000–2023), multi-temporal land use/cover data, 91 soil profiles (0–100 cm), remote-sensing stand classification, and plot surveys. Fire intensity × recovery-time effects were tested using two-way ANOVA. Carbon-loss rates were compared across fire intensities and frequencies. Land-use transition effects on 0–30 cm SOCD and stand-structure controls were quantified using ANOVA and generalized linear models (GLMs). Results Fire was the strongest near-surface carbon-loss process. Fire intensity, recovery time, and their interaction significantly affected stratified SOCD ( P < 0.05). Severe fires caused the largest losses, mainly in 0–40 cm soils. One year after fire, 0–100 cm SOCD declined by approximately 27.5%; after 5 and 10 years it recovered to approximately 87.2% and 94.9% of pre-fire levels, yet severe-burn sites remained approximately 8.7% below unburned references after a decade. Single-fire 0–100 cm loss rates ranged from 13.8% to 41.3% and increased with intensity; sites burned ≥ 3 times lost approximately 35.7%. Forest-to-cropland, forest-to-grassland, and forest-to-unused-land transitions reduced 0–30 cm SOCD by 34.8%, 22.7%, and 17.4%, whereas cropland-to-forest conversion increased SOCD by 12.8%. Larix gmelinii had the highest 0–100 cm SOCD (4.21 kg m⁻²), followed by Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (3.83 kg m⁻²). GLMs showed that dominant species, stand density, and canopy closure significantly regulated SOCD; a 10% increase in canopy closure was associated with + 1.09 kg m⁻² in 0–100 cm SOCD. Conclusions In this cold temperate forest landscape, fire attributes shape the depth and persistence of SOCD loss and recovery, while land-use transitions and stand structure modify carbon baselines and within-forest retention. Reducing high-severity short-interval reburns, limiting forest conversion, and maintaining structurally stable coniferous stands are process-consistent priorities for soil carbon conservation, within the constraints of the chronosequence sample.

Research Square
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN)
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon