Prompt Choice Is an Unreported Variable in Randomized Trials of Large Language Model Study Material

Large language models now produce summaries, flashcards, and practice questions for medical students, and randomized trials have begun to test this material. The prompt, the written instruction given to the model, shapes that material as much as the choice of model does. In a year-long randomized study in a neurology clerkship, summary quality on one model ranged from 50.9% to 76.9% on the study’s scoring rubric depending on the prompt alone. Yet the preprint does not include the prompt text. A trial that names the model but withholds the prompt does not describe a reproducible intervention. Seven reporting items would identify the intervention tested and document how its study material was generated. The items cover the prompt, the model version, how the prompt was selected, human editing, quality checks, source material, and how learners were trained to write prompts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23964481
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prompt Choice Is an Unreported Variable in Randomized Trials of Large Language Model Study Material

Thomas F Heston
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Prompt Choice Is an Unreported Variable in Randomized Trials of Large Language Model Study Material

Thomas F Heston
article en

Abstract

Large language models now produce summaries, flashcards, and practice questions for medical students, and randomized trials have begun to test this material. The prompt, the written instruction given to the model, shapes that material as much as the choice of model does. In a year-long randomized study in a neurology clerkship, summary quality on one model ranged from 50.9% to 76.9% on the study’s scoring rubric depending on the prompt alone. Yet the preprint does not include the prompt text. A trial that names the model but withholds the prompt does not describe a reproducible intervention. Seven reporting items would identify the intervention tested and document how its study material was generated. The items cover the prompt, the model version, how the prompt was selected, human editing, quality checks, source material, and how learners were trained to write prompts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Washington (US), Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon