Sycophancy and Extended Engagement with Publicly Accessible Generative AI: Aligning Deployment with Mental Health Needs

Abstract Purpose of Review Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a routine source of health information, emotional support, and companionship. As its use expands, the key public health question is not only whether these tools can support care, but whether their deployment is aligned with the mental health needs of the community. In this commentary, we argue that general-purpose AI systems pose distinct psychosocial risks, especially for young people and those experiencing loneliness or psychological distress. Recent Findings Emerging evidence suggests that sustained chatbot use may be associated with loneliness, reduced socialisation, emotional dependence, and problematic use, while sycophantic model behaviour may undermine users' capacity for self-correction and sustain a feedback loop of engagement. Current AI policy frameworks address governance and safety, but do not yet provide a coordinated response to these mental health risks. Summary Realising the benefits of AI without preventable community-level harm will require independent longitudinal research, psychosocial safety benchmarking, transparent post-deployment monitoring, and safety by design principles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-026-01723-y
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sycophancy and Extended Engagement with Publicly Accessible Generative AI: Aligning Deployment with Mental Health Needs

Kacper Gradoń, Andrew Rowland, Natansh Deepak Modi, Ashley Mark Hopkins et al.
Current Psychiatry Reports
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sycophancy and Extended Engagement with Publicly Accessible Generative AI: Aligning Deployment with Mental Health Needs

Kacper Gradoń, Andrew Rowland, Natansh Deepak Modi, Ashley Mark Hopkins, Malcolm Battersby, Bradley D. Menz, Timothy J. Schultz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a routine source of health information, emotional support, and companionship. As its use expands, the key public health question is not only whether these tools can support care, but whether their deployment is aligned with the mental health needs of the community. In this commentary, we argue that general-purpose AI systems pose distinct psychosocial risks, especially for young people and those experiencing loneliness or psychological distress. Recent Findings Emerging evidence suggests that sustained chatbot use may be associated with loneliness, reduced socialisation, emotional dependence, and problematic use, while sycophantic model behaviour may undermine users' capacity for self-correction and sustain a feedback loop of engagement. Current AI policy frameworks address governance and safety, but do not yet provide a coordinated response to these mental health risks. Summary Realising the benefits of AI without preventable community-level harm will require independent longitudinal research, psychosocial safety benchmarking, transparent post-deployment monitoring, and safety by design principles.

Current Psychiatry ReportsVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon