Development of Facial Soft-Tissue Asymmetry During Growth: A Mixed-Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Study

Background/Objectives: Most healthy faces are mildly asymmetric, but how this asymmetry changes during growth and relates to facial size is unclear. We examined whether whole-face soft-tissue asymmetry increases as children grow and whether any increase simply reflects facial growth. Methods: We analysed 1014 three-dimensional facial scans of 377 children aged 6.0–18.8 years, followed for up to 3.2 years (median 2.0); the primary asymmetry analysis included 1003 scans of 376 children, after whole-face values with an isolated extreme point were set to missing. Asymmetry was the mean absolute perpendicular distance between the facial surface and its mirror image. Mixed-effects models separated within-child change from between-child differences. Repeat-capture reliability was not assessed. Results: Asymmetry increased by 3.2% per year within children entering at 11 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2–4.1); older entrants were 2.7% more asymmetric per year of age (95% CI, 1.6–3.8). After adjustment for imaging session, the estimate was similar but imprecise (3.4%; 95% CI, −1.4 to 8.5). Facial size increased by 1.5% per year and asymmetry relative to size by 1.6%. Within children, asymmetry rose by about 1.7% for each 1% increase in facial size (exponent 1.73; 95% CI, 1.28–2.19); after adjustment for age this association was imprecise (0.89; 95% CI, −0.13 to 1.91), so the contributions of facial size and age could not be separated. Boys had 6.5% greater asymmetry; relative to facial size, 3.1% (95% CI, −2.0 to 8.6). Conclusions: On average, facial asymmetry increased modestly as children grew and increased relative to facial size over the observation period; whether this reflects facial enlargement itself or other age-related changes could not be determined. The estimated annual increase (about 0.013 mm) was below the residual variability between scans (about 0.04 mm); these population-level findings suggest that change cannot be detected in individual children, and individual monitoring and diagnostic thresholds require validated measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15218583
Primary Topic
Morphological variations and asymmetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Facial Soft-Tissue Asymmetry During Growth: A Mixed-Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Study

Marta Gibas‐Stanek, Petra Kamínková, Peter Dírer, Mette A.R. Kuijpers et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Morphological variations and asymmetry
article

Development of Facial Soft-Tissue Asymmetry During Growth: A Mixed-Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Study

Marta Gibas‐Stanek, Petra Kamínková, Peter Dírer, Mette A.R. Kuijpers, Thomas Maal, Robin Bruggink, Piotr Stanisław Fudalej
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Most healthy faces are mildly asymmetric, but how this asymmetry changes during growth and relates to facial size is unclear. We examined whether whole-face soft-tissue asymmetry increases as children grow and whether any increase simply reflects facial growth. Methods: We analysed 1014 three-dimensional facial scans of 377 children aged 6.0–18.8 years, followed for up to 3.2 years (median 2.0); the primary asymmetry analysis included 1003 scans of 376 children, after whole-face values with an isolated extreme point were set to missing. Asymmetry was the mean absolute perpendicular distance between the facial surface and its mirror image. Mixed-effects models separated within-child change from between-child differences. Repeat-capture reliability was not assessed. Results: Asymmetry increased by 3.2% per year within children entering at 11 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2–4.1); older entrants were 2.7% more asymmetric per year of age (95% CI, 1.6–3.8). After adjustment for imaging session, the estimate was similar but imprecise (3.4%; 95% CI, −1.4 to 8.5). Facial size increased by 1.5% per year and asymmetry relative to size by 1.6%. Within children, asymmetry rose by about 1.7% for each 1% increase in facial size (exponent 1.73; 95% CI, 1.28–2.19); after adjustment for age this association was imprecise (0.89; 95% CI, −0.13 to 1.91), so the contributions of facial size and age could not be separated. Boys had 6.5% greater asymmetry; relative to facial size, 3.1% (95% CI, −2.0 to 8.6). Conclusions: On average, facial asymmetry increased modestly as children grew and increased relative to facial size over the observation period; whether this reflects facial enlargement itself or other age-related changes could not be determined. The estimated annual increase (about 0.013 mm) was below the residual variability between scans (about 0.04 mm); these population-level findings suggest that change cannot be detected in individual children, and individual monitoring and diagnostic thresholds require validated measurement.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(21)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Morphological variations and asymmetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon