Frecuencia alfa pico según niveles de severidad en dolor neuropático y acúfeno: un análisis secundario exploratorio

Aim: This study examined whether peak alpha frequency (PAF) differs across clinical severity levels in neuropathic pain and tinnitus and compared two established PAF estimation methods. Design and methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using public resting-state EEG datasets from 36 patients with neuropathic pain and 36 patients with tinnitus. Severity was classified using the Brief Pain Inventory and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, respectively. One-minute eyes-closed EEG segments were preprocessed, and PAF was estimated at 16 shared electrodes and as a grand average using peak picking and center of gravity. Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed separately for each condition, and Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction was applied across 34 comparisons per condition. Results: No channel-level or grand-average comparison remained statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. In the neuropathic pain group, peak picking produced a nominal unadjusted difference at T7 (p = 0.0169), which did not survive correction (q = 0.5746). No significant findings were identified in the tinnitus group. Limitations and implications: Interpretation is limited by the fixed and modest sample sizes, potentially imbalanced severity subgroups, absence of healthy controls, use of one-minute EEG segments, clinical and acquisition heterogeneity, different EEG reference configurations, and lack of prospective validation. Original contribution: Rather than proposing a new PAF estimator, this study provides a harmonized comparison of peak picking and center of gravity across two public clinical EEG datasets and evaluates the robustness of severity-related findings after multiplicity correction. Conclusions: The results do not provide robust evidence that PAF alone differentiates severity levels in neuropathic pain or tinnitus. The nominal T7 observation should be considered hypothesis-generating and requires independent validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17488/rmib.47.3.1660
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frecuencia alfa pico según niveles de severidad en dolor neuropático y acúfeno: un análisis secundario exploratorio

Andrea González-Sánchez, David Ibarra, Luz María Alonso Valerdi
Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Frecuencia alfa pico según niveles de severidad en dolor neuropático y acúfeno: un análisis secundario exploratorio

Andrea González-Sánchez, David Ibarra, Luz María Alonso Valerdi
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study examined whether peak alpha frequency (PAF) differs across clinical severity levels in neuropathic pain and tinnitus and compared two established PAF estimation methods. Design and methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using public resting-state EEG datasets from 36 patients with neuropathic pain and 36 patients with tinnitus. Severity was classified using the Brief Pain Inventory and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, respectively. One-minute eyes-closed EEG segments were preprocessed, and PAF was estimated at 16 shared electrodes and as a grand average using peak picking and center of gravity. Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed separately for each condition, and Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction was applied across 34 comparisons per condition. Results: No channel-level or grand-average comparison remained statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. In the neuropathic pain group, peak picking produced a nominal unadjusted difference at T7 (p = 0.0169), which did not survive correction (q = 0.5746). No significant findings were identified in the tinnitus group. Limitations and implications: Interpretation is limited by the fixed and modest sample sizes, potentially imbalanced severity subgroups, absence of healthy controls, use of one-minute EEG segments, clinical and acquisition heterogeneity, different EEG reference configurations, and lack of prospective validation. Original contribution: Rather than proposing a new PAF estimator, this study provides a harmonized comparison of peak picking and center of gravity across two public clinical EEG datasets and evaluates the robustness of severity-related findings after multiplicity correction. Conclusions: The results do not provide robust evidence that PAF alone differentiates severity levels in neuropathic pain or tinnitus. The nominal T7 observation should be considered hypothesis-generating and requires independent validation.

Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica
Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon