Application of a Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer for Unconsolidated Sediments at Archaeological Sites: Capabilities and Limitations

Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) is increasingly used in geoarchaeology because it enables rapid elemental measurements directly in the field or with minimal sample preparation. However, quantitative interpretation of pXRF data from unconsolidated sediments is complicated by matrix effects, moisture, grain-size heterogeneity, spectral interference, and the weak detection of light elements. We investigated these limitations using sediment samples from the Orkhon River Valley and Tsagaan Agui Cave in Mongolia. Samples were analyzed by an Olympus Vanta M-series pXRF analyzer and by an ARL 9900 XP laboratory wavelength-dispersive XRF spectrometer after fusion-bead preparation. The laboratory results were used as a reference dataset, and empirical regression equations were established for selected elements. The agreement between the two methods was element- and site-dependent. In the Orkhon River Valley, the strongest relationships were obtained for Fe and Ca, whereas Ti showed the weakest relationship. In the Tsagaan Agui Cave samples, Ca, Fe, and Mn showed the highest explanatory power, while Al showed the weakest relationship. These results indicate that pXRF data can rapidly reproduce major stratigraphic compositional trends under field-oriented conditions, but universal conversion equations should not be applied to different sedimentary or archaeological settings. In particular, Mg, Al, and Si may be underestimated in moist or heterogeneous sediments, and Na cannot generally be quantified reliably under standard air-path conditions. We recommend using pXRF primarily as a rapid field-screening tool for identifying compositional anomalies and stratigraphic intervals that require closer inspection, targeted sampling, or subsequent laboratory analysis. Where quantitative interpretation is required, pXRF data should be supported by matrix-matched calibration and laboratory validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaternary
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/quat9060075
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer for Unconsolidated Sediments at Archaeological Sites: Capabilities and Limitations

Elena Riazanova, Arina M. Khatsenovich, E.P. Rybin, Ирина Андреевна Вишневская et al.
Quaternary
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
article

Application of a Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer for Unconsolidated Sediments at Archaeological Sites: Capabilities and Limitations

Elena Riazanova, Arina M. Khatsenovich, E.P. Rybin, Ирина Андреевна Вишневская, Kirill Syromyatnikov
article en

Abstract

Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) is increasingly used in geoarchaeology because it enables rapid elemental measurements directly in the field or with minimal sample preparation. However, quantitative interpretation of pXRF data from unconsolidated sediments is complicated by matrix effects, moisture, grain-size heterogeneity, spectral interference, and the weak detection of light elements. We investigated these limitations using sediment samples from the Orkhon River Valley and Tsagaan Agui Cave in Mongolia. Samples were analyzed by an Olympus Vanta M-series pXRF analyzer and by an ARL 9900 XP laboratory wavelength-dispersive XRF spectrometer after fusion-bead preparation. The laboratory results were used as a reference dataset, and empirical regression equations were established for selected elements. The agreement between the two methods was element- and site-dependent. In the Orkhon River Valley, the strongest relationships were obtained for Fe and Ca, whereas Ti showed the weakest relationship. In the Tsagaan Agui Cave samples, Ca, Fe, and Mn showed the highest explanatory power, while Al showed the weakest relationship. These results indicate that pXRF data can rapidly reproduce major stratigraphic compositional trends under field-oriented conditions, but universal conversion equations should not be applied to different sedimentary or archaeological settings. In particular, Mg, Al, and Si may be underestimated in moist or heterogeneous sediments, and Na cannot generally be quantified reliably under standard air-path conditions. We recommend using pXRF primarily as a rapid field-screening tool for identifying compositional anomalies and stratigraphic intervals that require closer inspection, targeted sampling, or subsequent laboratory analysis. Where quantitative interpretation is required, pXRF data should be supported by matrix-matched calibration and laboratory validation.

QuaternaryVol. 9(6)
V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (RU), Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon