Stray Losses in Power Transformers: A Comparative Study of Modeling Frameworks for Mild Steel

Accurately predicting eddy-current and hysteresis losses in mild steel components such as the structural parts and tank of power transformers remains a challenge in transformer design. Conventional numerical approaches for eddy-current loss analysis require discretization at a fraction of the skin depth. While accurate, such fine volumetric mesh becomes computationally prohibitive for large power transformers. Moreover, hysteresis loss is not always included in this analysis. To investigate the trade-off between computational cost and accuracy, this work presents a comparative analysis of eight distinct modeling frameworks for predicting both eddy-current and hysteresis losses in mild steel. These include efficient methods avoiding meshing, such as standard impedance boundary conditions, and more accurate approaches retaining full volumetric meshing, namely complex permeability, nonlinear single-valued B-H curve, and Jiles-Atherton hysteresis modeling. To accurately represent the material's electromagnetic behavior, the properties of the mild steel used are measured directly from samples. Finally, loss measurements are conducted to benchmark all eight frameworks, demonstrating mean absolute percentage errors between predictions and measurements generally below 20%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2611.05109
Primary Topic
Magnetic Properties and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Stray Losses in Power Transformers: A Comparative Study of Modeling Frameworks for Mild Steel

Guus A. J. M. Pemen, T. Huiskamp, Siamak Pourkeivannour, Timo T. Overboom et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Magnetic Properties and Applications
preprint

Stray Losses in Power Transformers: A Comparative Study of Modeling Frameworks for Mild Steel

Guus A. J. M. Pemen, T. Huiskamp, Siamak Pourkeivannour, Timo T. Overboom, Micha Swaanen
preprint en

Abstract

Accurately predicting eddy-current and hysteresis losses in mild steel components such as the structural parts and tank of power transformers remains a challenge in transformer design. Conventional numerical approaches for eddy-current loss analysis require discretization at a fraction of the skin depth. While accurate, such fine volumetric mesh becomes computationally prohibitive for large power transformers. Moreover, hysteresis loss is not always included in this analysis. To investigate the trade-off between computational cost and accuracy, this work presents a comparative analysis of eight distinct modeling frameworks for predicting both eddy-current and hysteresis losses in mild steel. These include efficient methods avoiding meshing, such as standard impedance boundary conditions, and more accurate approaches retaining full volumetric meshing, namely complex permeability, nonlinear single-valued B-H curve, and Jiles-Atherton hysteresis modeling. To accurately represent the material's electromagnetic behavior, the properties of the mild steel used are measured directly from samples. Finally, loss measurements are conducted to benchmark all eight frameworks, demonstrating mean absolute percentage errors between predictions and measurements generally below 20%.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Magnetic Properties and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon