Enterprise AI Model Risk Scoring and Continuous Assurance Framework

AI model portfolios now include predictive models, Generative AI, foundation models, RetrievalAugmented Generation systems, and agentic components with widely different risk profiles. Static approval processes and one-time validation are insufficient because model behavior, data, usage, integrations, and external dependencies can change after deployment. This paper proposes an Enterprise AI Model Risk Scoring and Continuous Assurance Framework that combines risk dimensions, quantitative scoring, control requirements, lifecycle gates, monitoring, change detection, reassessment triggers, and residual-risk reporting. The framework evaluates business impact, autonomy, data sensitivity, model complexity, explainability, external exposure, reversibility, regulatory relevance, security, robustness, provider dependency, and operational resilience. It introduces inherent-risk scoring, control-effectiveness adjustment, residual-risk calculation, confidence scoring, and risk-tier-based assurance frequencies. The proposed approach enables enterprises to prioritize validation and monitoring resources, identify deteriorating controls, and maintain evidence-based assurance throughout the AI lifecycle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23943899
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enterprise AI Model Risk Scoring and Continuous Assurance Framework

Sanjeeve Kumar Gajadi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Enterprise AI Model Risk Scoring and Continuous Assurance Framework

Sanjeeve Kumar Gajadi
article en

Abstract

AI model portfolios now include predictive models, Generative AI, foundation models, RetrievalAugmented Generation systems, and agentic components with widely different risk profiles. Static approval processes and one-time validation are insufficient because model behavior, data, usage, integrations, and external dependencies can change after deployment. This paper proposes an Enterprise AI Model Risk Scoring and Continuous Assurance Framework that combines risk dimensions, quantitative scoring, control requirements, lifecycle gates, monitoring, change detection, reassessment triggers, and residual-risk reporting. The framework evaluates business impact, autonomy, data sensitivity, model complexity, explainability, external exposure, reversibility, regulatory relevance, security, robustness, provider dependency, and operational resilience. It introduces inherent-risk scoring, control-effectiveness adjustment, residual-risk calculation, confidence scoring, and risk-tier-based assurance frequencies. The proposed approach enables enterprises to prioritize validation and monitoring resources, identify deteriorating controls, and maintain evidence-based assurance throughout the AI lifecycle.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon