Knowledge, Skills, Values and Behaviors in Sustainability Education for Engineering Students in Europe: A Systematic Review

Engineering education should be expected to equip students to contribute to sustainability. Although a wide range of initiatives have been reported across Europe, their outcomes for students and the strength of the evidence supporting these outcomes remain inconsistent. To examine the latter, this study conducts a systematic review of the literature using the Scopus and ERIC databases, following PRISMA 2020 (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). The databases were last searched on 9 October 2026 for peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 2020 whose educational setting was in Europe. A total of 32 relevant studies published between January 2020 and October 2026 were scrutinized and analyzed, and their methodological approach was appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT): 24 studies were rated high quality, three moderate and five low. The studies show that European engineering programs rely mainly on active pedagogies (project, problem and challenge-based learning, redesigned courses and modules, and digital, creative or gamified formats), alongside program-level initiatives and, less often, community and industry-engaged learning. These initiatives are concentrated in a few countries, with Spain alone accounting for nearly 14 of the 32 studies. Questionnaires were the most common data-collection method (21 studies), while pre/post, comparative and longitudinal designs remain rare. Knowledge is the most frequently addressed dimension (29 studies), followed by skills (27), values (26) and behaviors (20). Reported changes were demonstrated in only seven studies for knowledge, four for skills, five for values and three for behaviors. These findings highlight a gap between the breadth of sustainability education initiatives and the evidence available to establish their outcomes. Engineering educators and researchers should therefore combine curriculum-wide sustainability integration with more rigorous, longitudinal and comparative evaluation to determine whether educational initiatives translate into sustained changes in students’ knowledge, skills, values and behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182111266
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Skills, Values and Behaviors in Sustainability Education for Engineering Students in Europe: A Systematic Review

Mantoura Nakad, Linda Gardelle
Sustainability
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Knowledge, Skills, Values and Behaviors in Sustainability Education for Engineering Students in Europe: A Systematic Review

Mantoura Nakad, Linda Gardelle
article en

Abstract

Engineering education should be expected to equip students to contribute to sustainability. Although a wide range of initiatives have been reported across Europe, their outcomes for students and the strength of the evidence supporting these outcomes remain inconsistent. To examine the latter, this study conducts a systematic review of the literature using the Scopus and ERIC databases, following PRISMA 2020 (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). The databases were last searched on 9 October 2026 for peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 2020 whose educational setting was in Europe. A total of 32 relevant studies published between January 2020 and October 2026 were scrutinized and analyzed, and their methodological approach was appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT): 24 studies were rated high quality, three moderate and five low. The studies show that European engineering programs rely mainly on active pedagogies (project, problem and challenge-based learning, redesigned courses and modules, and digital, creative or gamified formats), alongside program-level initiatives and, less often, community and industry-engaged learning. These initiatives are concentrated in a few countries, with Spain alone accounting for nearly 14 of the 32 studies. Questionnaires were the most common data-collection method (21 studies), while pre/post, comparative and longitudinal designs remain rare. Knowledge is the most frequently addressed dimension (29 studies), followed by skills (27), values (26) and behaviors (20). Reported changes were demonstrated in only seven studies for knowledge, four for skills, five for values and three for behaviors. These findings highlight a gap between the breadth of sustainability education initiatives and the evidence available to establish their outcomes. Engineering educators and researchers should therefore combine curriculum-wide sustainability integration with more rigorous, longitudinal and comparative evaluation to determine whether educational initiatives translate into sustained changes in students’ knowledge, skills, values and behaviors.

SustainabilityVol. 18(21)
University of Balamand (LB), École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon