Cost‐Effectiveness of Early Dose Reduction or Discontinuation Versus Antipsychotic Maintenance After First‐Episode Psychosis: Results From the HAMLETT Study

ABSTRACT Background After remission from a first episode psychosis (FEP), international clinical guidelines recommend continuation of antipsychotic medication for at least 1 year, although many patients wish to reduce or discontinue medication due to side effects or long‐term health concerns. Evidence on the cost‐effectiveness of early dose reduction or discontinuation compared to continuation remains limited. Methods A trial‐based cost‐utility analysis was conducted alongside the ongoing HAMLETT study, in which 347 remitted FEP participants were randomized to either early guided dose reduction or discontinuation or maintenance treatment for 1 year. Both healthcare and societal perspectives over a 24‐month time horizon were considered. Health outcomes were expressed as quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire using Dutch valuation tariffs. Costs were estimated using patient reported healthcare utilization and administrative pharmacy data. Incremental costs and effects were analysed using seemingly unrelated regression with uncertainty assessed through nonparametric bootstrapping and multiple sensitivity analyses. Results Early dose reduction or discontinuation was associated with lower quality‐adjusted life years and higher or comparable costs compared with maintenance treatment over the 2‐year analysis period. In the base‐case societal perspective analysis, incremental costs were €23,563 and incremental effects were −0.077 QALYs, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of ‐€27,430 at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of €50,000 per QALY at 24 months. Results were consistent across several scenarios with only approximately 9% probability that early dose reduction or discontinuation was cost‐effective at the assumed willingness‐to‐pay threshold. However, a sex‐at‐birth subgroup analysis suggested a small and uncertain positive incremental net monetary benefit among female participants. Conclusion Over a 24‐month period, early dose reduction or discontinuation of antipsychotic medication after remission from a FEP is unlikely to be cost‐effective compared with maintenance treatment from both healthcare and societal perspectives. Whether longer term functional improvements associated with early dose reduction translate into cost‐effective benefits remains uncertain and requires follow‐up. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2017‐002406‐12

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70152
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Early Dose Reduction or Discontinuation Versus Antipsychotic Maintenance After First‐Episode Psychosis: Results From the HAMLETT Study

Marieke Begemann, Ole A. Andreassen, Jim van Os, Martijn Kikkert et al.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Early Dose Reduction or Discontinuation Versus Antipsychotic Maintenance After First‐Episode Psychosis: Results From the HAMLETT Study

Marieke Begemann, Ole A. Andreassen, Jim van Os, Martijn Kikkert, Nynke Boonstra, Iris E. Sommer, Shiral S. Gangadin, Sanne Koops, Lieuwe de Haan, Frederick W.F. Thielen, Ben F. M. Wijnen, Franciska de Beer, Bram‐Sieben Rosema, Wim Veling, Nico van Beveren, Rosanne Diepeveen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background After remission from a first episode psychosis (FEP), international clinical guidelines recommend continuation of antipsychotic medication for at least 1 year, although many patients wish to reduce or discontinue medication due to side effects or long‐term health concerns. Evidence on the cost‐effectiveness of early dose reduction or discontinuation compared to continuation remains limited. Methods A trial‐based cost‐utility analysis was conducted alongside the ongoing HAMLETT study, in which 347 remitted FEP participants were randomized to either early guided dose reduction or discontinuation or maintenance treatment for 1 year. Both healthcare and societal perspectives over a 24‐month time horizon were considered. Health outcomes were expressed as quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire using Dutch valuation tariffs. Costs were estimated using patient reported healthcare utilization and administrative pharmacy data. Incremental costs and effects were analysed using seemingly unrelated regression with uncertainty assessed through nonparametric bootstrapping and multiple sensitivity analyses. Results Early dose reduction or discontinuation was associated with lower quality‐adjusted life years and higher or comparable costs compared with maintenance treatment over the 2‐year analysis period. In the base‐case societal perspective analysis, incremental costs were €23,563 and incremental effects were −0.077 QALYs, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of ‐€27,430 at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of €50,000 per QALY at 24 months. Results were consistent across several scenarios with only approximately 9% probability that early dose reduction or discontinuation was cost‐effective at the assumed willingness‐to‐pay threshold. However, a sex‐at‐birth subgroup analysis suggested a small and uncertain positive incremental net monetary benefit among female participants. Conclusion Over a 24‐month period, early dose reduction or discontinuation of antipsychotic medication after remission from a FEP is unlikely to be cost‐effective compared with maintenance treatment from both healthcare and societal perspectives. Whether longer term functional improvements associated with early dose reduction translate into cost‐effective benefits remains uncertain and requires follow‐up. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2017‐002406‐12

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Groningen (NL), King's College London (GB), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Yale University (US), Trimbos Institute (NL), Antes (NL), Arkin (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon