A comparative experimental and kinetic modeling study of methane production from human feces: insights into methane production dynamics and engineering considerations

Introduction Human feces (HF) is an abundant and untapped bioresource that holds significant promise for decentralized anaerobic digestion-based energy recovery. However, the heterogeneity of its composition makes the predictability of methane yield highly challenging, thereby limiting reactor design, startup behavior, and process optimization. Methods In the present study, a biomethane potential assay was performed for 31 days using a mixed community-derived HF substrate at 35 °C ± 2 °C, and the experimental results were coupled with kinetic modeling to analyze methane production dynamics. Six kinetic models, including Modified Gompertz, First-order, Logistic, Richards, Cone, and Transfer Function models, were evaluated using nonlinear least squares regression. Results The cumulative methane yield reached 247.48 ± 5.83 NmL CH 4 g −1 VS, with approximately 90% of the total methane production occurring within 15 days, indicating relatively rapid methane production under the conditions of the present batch assay. Among the evaluated models, the Richards model provided the best fit to the experimental data (R 2 = 0.9973), followed by the Logistic and Modified Gompertz models. In contrast, the First-order model showed comparatively poorer performance for the present dataset, consistent with the limitations of its simple exponential formulation in representing a distinct lag phase preceding methane production. Discussion From a bioprocess engineering perspective, these findings suggest that kinetic model selection can substantially influence the characterization of methane production dynamics and estimation of key kinetic parameters relevant to anaerobic digestion performance. The comparative modeling approach developed in this study can contribute to providing a practical basis for evaluating kinetic models applied to heterogeneous substrates such as human feces and may support future reactor design, process optimization, and operational studies following validation under a wider range of feedstocks and operating conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1965030
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative experimental and kinetic modeling study of methane production from human feces: insights into methane production dynamics and engineering considerations

Vijai Pal, A. K. Goel, Richa Arya, M. K. Meghvansi
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

A comparative experimental and kinetic modeling study of methane production from human feces: insights into methane production dynamics and engineering considerations

Vijai Pal, A. K. Goel, Richa Arya, M. K. Meghvansi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Human feces (HF) is an abundant and untapped bioresource that holds significant promise for decentralized anaerobic digestion-based energy recovery. However, the heterogeneity of its composition makes the predictability of methane yield highly challenging, thereby limiting reactor design, startup behavior, and process optimization. Methods In the present study, a biomethane potential assay was performed for 31 days using a mixed community-derived HF substrate at 35 °C ± 2 °C, and the experimental results were coupled with kinetic modeling to analyze methane production dynamics. Six kinetic models, including Modified Gompertz, First-order, Logistic, Richards, Cone, and Transfer Function models, were evaluated using nonlinear least squares regression. Results The cumulative methane yield reached 247.48 ± 5.83 NmL CH 4 g −1 VS, with approximately 90% of the total methane production occurring within 15 days, indicating relatively rapid methane production under the conditions of the present batch assay. Among the evaluated models, the Richards model provided the best fit to the experimental data (R 2 = 0.9973), followed by the Logistic and Modified Gompertz models. In contrast, the First-order model showed comparatively poorer performance for the present dataset, consistent with the limitations of its simple exponential formulation in representing a distinct lag phase preceding methane production. Discussion From a bioprocess engineering perspective, these findings suggest that kinetic model selection can substantially influence the characterization of methane production dynamics and estimation of key kinetic parameters relevant to anaerobic digestion performance. The comparative modeling approach developed in this study can contribute to providing a practical basis for evaluating kinetic models applied to heterogeneous substrates such as human feces and may support future reactor design, process optimization, and operational studies following validation under a wider range of feedstocks and operating conditions.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 14
Defence Research and Development Establishment (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon