Technologies of the Self after Foucault: Care, Desire, and Mute Compulsion in Neoliberal Subjectivation

This article reconstructs Foucault’s late account of technologies of the self as a historically situated problematic of subjectivation, and not a toolkit for self-help. It confronts this problematic with Lacanian psychoanalysis – the split subject, desire, fantasy, jouissance, the object a, the Real – via Slavoj Žižek, and with Marxian theories of abstract domination, especially Søren Mau’s mute compulsion and Samo Tomšič’s Marx-Lacan homology. Rather than synthesis, it proposes articulation: historical practice, libidinal investment, and material compulsion remain analytically distinct yet empirically entangled. Drawing on research on therapy culture, workplace authenticity, education, and generative AI, it argues that critique of contemporary self-care must distinguish ethical practice from governmental capture, desire from preference, and formal freedom from its material conditions – reviving Foucault’s late turn toward parrēsia and care of the city.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemos
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2026.109.10
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technologies of the Self after Foucault: Care, Desire, and Mute Compulsion in Neoliberal Subjectivation

Марія Панасюк
Problemos
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
article

Technologies of the Self after Foucault: Care, Desire, and Mute Compulsion in Neoliberal Subjectivation

Марія Панасюк
article en

Abstract

This article reconstructs Foucault’s late account of technologies of the self as a historically situated problematic of subjectivation, and not a toolkit for self-help. It confronts this problematic with Lacanian psychoanalysis – the split subject, desire, fantasy, jouissance, the object a, the Real – via Slavoj Žižek, and with Marxian theories of abstract domination, especially Søren Mau’s mute compulsion and Samo Tomšič’s Marx-Lacan homology. Rather than synthesis, it proposes articulation: historical practice, libidinal investment, and material compulsion remain analytically distinct yet empirically entangled. Drawing on research on therapy culture, workplace authenticity, education, and generative AI, it argues that critique of contemporary self-care must distinguish ethical practice from governmental capture, desire from preference, and formal freedom from its material conditions – reviving Foucault’s late turn toward parrēsia and care of the city.

ProblemosVol. 109
National University Ostroh Academy (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Technologies of the Self after Foucault: Care, Desire, and Mute Compulsion in Neoliberal Subjectivation — Марія Панасюк · Problemos (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS