A randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled feasibility study of systemic administration of equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in feline chronic kidney disease

Feline chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most frequently diagnosed diseases in cats and affects particular older cats. Regenerative therapies are being explored as a potential solution since current treatments largely address symptoms and disease management without targeting underlying tissue repair. The current study preliminary investigates potential adverse events and the feasibility of a systemic application of primed ( n = 7) or unprimed ( n = 7) equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ePB-MSCs) versus placebo control ( n = 7). An exploratory, blinded, randomized placebo-controlled study in 21 cats with feline CKD was performed in one veterinary practice with daily owner evaluations and veterinary visits on days 0, 28 ± 3, 56 ± 3, and 84 ± 3 (optional: days 182 ± 7, 365 ± 14, and 547 ± 14). Three serious adverse events were observed throughout the study period: two in the placebo control product (CP) group and one in the primed ePB-MSC group. Generally, it can be concluded that acceptable adverse events were identified in this small cohort after a single intravenous (IV) administration of primed or unprimed ePB-MSCs in cats with CKD. The blood pressure (BP) change from baseline showed no significant treatment effect ( p = 0.1543). The lowest (unadjusted) p -value ( p = 0.027) was found for the comparison between CP and primed ePB-MSCs at day 56 but failed to be significant as the adjusted comparison-wise significance level equaled p = 0.006. For SDMA ( p = 0.9197), quality of life (QOL) ( p = 0.9742), and IRIS stage ( p = 0.8230), no significant treatment effects were found. In conclusion, the single IV application of ePB-MSCs in cats suffering from CKD showed acceptable adverse events in this small sample size. Based on the current data, there was no evidence that the administration of ePB-MSCs was more effective than the control. Further studies evaluating the efficacy and study limitations of ePB-MSCs in cats suffering from CKD are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1857026
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled feasibility study of systemic administration of equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in feline chronic kidney disease

Liesa Tack, Jan H. Spaas, Sarah Y. Broeckx, Laurens Van Mulders et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

A randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled feasibility study of systemic administration of equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in feline chronic kidney disease

Liesa Tack, Jan H. Spaas, Sarah Y. Broeckx, Laurens Van Mulders, Sylvie Daminet, Glenn Pauwelyn, Eva Depuydt, Luc Duchateau, Sophie I. J. Vandenabeele, Nathalie de Bouvré, Charlotte Beerts, Jimmy Saunders, Ellen Vanden Broecke
article en

Abstract

Feline chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most frequently diagnosed diseases in cats and affects particular older cats. Regenerative therapies are being explored as a potential solution since current treatments largely address symptoms and disease management without targeting underlying tissue repair. The current study preliminary investigates potential adverse events and the feasibility of a systemic application of primed ( n = 7) or unprimed ( n = 7) equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ePB-MSCs) versus placebo control ( n = 7). An exploratory, blinded, randomized placebo-controlled study in 21 cats with feline CKD was performed in one veterinary practice with daily owner evaluations and veterinary visits on days 0, 28 ± 3, 56 ± 3, and 84 ± 3 (optional: days 182 ± 7, 365 ± 14, and 547 ± 14). Three serious adverse events were observed throughout the study period: two in the placebo control product (CP) group and one in the primed ePB-MSC group. Generally, it can be concluded that acceptable adverse events were identified in this small cohort after a single intravenous (IV) administration of primed or unprimed ePB-MSCs in cats with CKD. The blood pressure (BP) change from baseline showed no significant treatment effect ( p = 0.1543). The lowest (unadjusted) p -value ( p = 0.027) was found for the comparison between CP and primed ePB-MSCs at day 56 but failed to be significant as the adjusted comparison-wise significance level equaled p = 0.006. For SDMA ( p = 0.9197), quality of life (QOL) ( p = 0.9742), and IRIS stage ( p = 0.8230), no significant treatment effects were found. In conclusion, the single IV application of ePB-MSCs in cats suffering from CKD showed acceptable adverse events in this small sample size. Based on the current data, there was no evidence that the administration of ePB-MSCs was more effective than the control. Further studies evaluating the efficacy and study limitations of ePB-MSCs in cats suffering from CKD are recommended.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 13
Ghent University (BE), Boehringer Ingelheim (Belgium) (BE), UniLaSalle (FR), Université d'Artois (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon