Quality Consistency Assessment among MODIS, MERSI, and VIIRS Cloud Mask Products using China’s Space-borne Lidar ACDL

Abstract. Cloud masking is the fundamental step in accurately retrieving cloud and many other properties from satellite-based imagers. Intercomparisons among imagers are frequently conducted to assess the agreement of cloud masks at both global and granule scales, ensuring accuracy while also enabling the merging of multi-satellite products for use in NWP models and climate datasets. However, common challenges arise in scenarios with reduced spectral contrast between clouds and backgrounds, leading to generally degraded performance at polar regions and making validation through intercomparison less reliable. Building on previous synergistic observations between CALIOP and MODIS in the A-Train constellation, this study employed China's Aerosol and Carbon Detection Lidar (ACDL) as a new benchmark to evaluate cloud masks from 3 passive sensors across different operational stages. Analyzing approximately 3 million collocated samples in February and August 2024, the overall hit rates for confident cloudy/clear pixels from Aqua/MODIS, FY-3D/MERSI-II, and NOAA-21/VIIRS reached 82.9 %, 79.3 %, and 86.4 %, respectively. Detailed examinations of monthly, day/night, and latitudinal subsets revealed variation in each sensor's performance across scenarios and identified the reasons behind the discrepancies. The study highlighted the importance of active-passive validation, which confirms consistency among passive imagers while also identifying algorithmic weaknesses that need improvement for future missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6224
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Quality Consistency Assessment among MODIS, MERSI, and VIIRS Cloud Mask Products using China’s Space-borne Lidar ACDL

Lin Chen, Sijie Chen, Jian Liu, Bo Li et al.
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
preprint

Quality Consistency Assessment among MODIS, MERSI, and VIIRS Cloud Mask Products using China’s Space-borne Lidar ACDL

Lin Chen, Sijie Chen, Jian Liu, Bo Li, Xi Wang, Zhaojun Zheng
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract. Cloud masking is the fundamental step in accurately retrieving cloud and many other properties from satellite-based imagers. Intercomparisons among imagers are frequently conducted to assess the agreement of cloud masks at both global and granule scales, ensuring accuracy while also enabling the merging of multi-satellite products for use in NWP models and climate datasets. However, common challenges arise in scenarios with reduced spectral contrast between clouds and backgrounds, leading to generally degraded performance at polar regions and making validation through intercomparison less reliable. Building on previous synergistic observations between CALIOP and MODIS in the A-Train constellation, this study employed China's Aerosol and Carbon Detection Lidar (ACDL) as a new benchmark to evaluate cloud masks from 3 passive sensors across different operational stages. Analyzing approximately 3 million collocated samples in February and August 2024, the overall hit rates for confident cloudy/clear pixels from Aqua/MODIS, FY-3D/MERSI-II, and NOAA-21/VIIRS reached 82.9 %, 79.3 %, and 86.4 %, respectively. Detailed examinations of monthly, day/night, and latitudinal subsets revealed variation in each sensor's performance across scenarios and identified the reasons behind the discrepancies. The study highlighted the importance of active-passive validation, which confirms consistency among passive imagers while also identifying algorithmic weaknesses that need improvement for future missions.

China Meteorological Administration (CN)
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon