BioTrajX: evaluating biological plausibility in single-cell trajectory inference

Trajectory inference (TI) methods reconstruct cellular progression from single-cell RNA sequencing data, typically by ordering cells along a pseudotime axis. However, different TI methods and analytical choices can produce divergent trajectories from the same dataset, making it difficult to determine which inferred trajectory best reflects the underlying biological process. Existing evaluation strategies often rely on computational benchmarks or qualitative biological assessment, with limited standardized approaches for incorporating a priori biological knowledge. Here, we present BioTrajX, an R package for biologically informed evaluation of pseudotime trajectories using three complementary metrics: Directionality (D), which measures agreement between pseudotime and expected biological progression; Order Consistency (O), which quantifies the coherence of marker-program changes along the trajectory; and Endpoint Validity (E), which assesses enrichment of expected cell states at trajectory endpoints. Together, the DOE metrics provide an interpretable framework for comparing alternative trajectory inference results and evaluating root-cell choices prior to downstream analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.02.763572
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

BioTrajX: evaluating biological plausibility in single-cell trajectory inference

Yao‐Ming Chang, Shih-Yu Chen, Tsz Ying Li
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
preprint

BioTrajX: evaluating biological plausibility in single-cell trajectory inference

Yao‐Ming Chang, Shih-Yu Chen, Tsz Ying Li
preprint en

Abstract

Trajectory inference (TI) methods reconstruct cellular progression from single-cell RNA sequencing data, typically by ordering cells along a pseudotime axis. However, different TI methods and analytical choices can produce divergent trajectories from the same dataset, making it difficult to determine which inferred trajectory best reflects the underlying biological process. Existing evaluation strategies often rely on computational benchmarks or qualitative biological assessment, with limited standardized approaches for incorporating a priori biological knowledge. Here, we present BioTrajX, an R package for biologically informed evaluation of pseudotime trajectories using three complementary metrics: Directionality (D), which measures agreement between pseudotime and expected biological progression; Order Consistency (O), which quantifies the coherence of marker-program changes along the trajectory; and Endpoint Validity (E), which assesses enrichment of expected cell states at trajectory endpoints. Together, the DOE metrics provide an interpretable framework for comparing alternative trajectory inference results and evaluating root-cell choices prior to downstream analyses.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW)
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon