Knowledge Layers for Analytics Agents: Architectures, Frameworks, and Open Challenges

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly asked to answer questions over enterprise data, yet their failures in that setting are rarely failures of language modeling. They are failures of grounding: the agent does not know what a metric means, which join is legitimate, which table is authoritative, or what it is permitted to see. Between the raw data estate and the agent sits a knowledge layer — the governed definitions, knowledge graphs, catalogs, and access structures that determine what the agent can know and how reliably it can know it. This survey takes the knowledge layer, rather than the agent, as its unit of analysis, and organizes the literature into five branches: the definition layer of semantic and metric models; the knowledge substrate of enterprise and virtual knowledge graphs, catalogs, and metadata graphs; augmentation frameworks that bring structured knowledge into generation, with the Knowledge Augmented Generation (KAG) framework as an anchor case; grounding and consumption mechanisms, centered on the relationship between literature and the Spider to Spider 2.0 benchmark progression; and governance and trust — access control, provenance, freshness, and curation. The synthesis is deliberately critical. Several branches rest on vendor documentation rather than scholarship, the anchor framework's primary record is proprietary, the specializing semantic-layer literature is months old, and the governance branch is thin enough that its absences are among the survey's principal findings. An eighteen-item gap register, each item backed by documented searches, closes the survey as a research agenda ordered by consequence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34908258
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Knowledge Layers for Analytics Agents: Architectures, Frameworks, and Open Challenges

Vinuraj Devaraj
Figshare
Topic Modeling
preprint

Knowledge Layers for Analytics Agents: Architectures, Frameworks, and Open Challenges

Vinuraj Devaraj
preprint en

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly asked to answer questions over enterprise data, yet their failures in that setting are rarely failures of language modeling. They are failures of grounding: the agent does not know what a metric means, which join is legitimate, which table is authoritative, or what it is permitted to see. Between the raw data estate and the agent sits a knowledge layer — the governed definitions, knowledge graphs, catalogs, and access structures that determine what the agent can know and how reliably it can know it. This survey takes the knowledge layer, rather than the agent, as its unit of analysis, and organizes the literature into five branches: the definition layer of semantic and metric models; the knowledge substrate of enterprise and virtual knowledge graphs, catalogs, and metadata graphs; augmentation frameworks that bring structured knowledge into generation, with the Knowledge Augmented Generation (KAG) framework as an anchor case; grounding and consumption mechanisms, centered on the relationship between literature and the Spider to Spider 2.0 benchmark progression; and governance and trust — access control, provenance, freshness, and curation. The synthesis is deliberately critical. Several branches rest on vendor documentation rather than scholarship, the anchor framework's primary record is proprietary, the specializing semantic-layer literature is months old, and the governance branch is thin enough that its absences are among the survey's principal findings. An eighteen-item gap register, each item backed by documented searches, closes the survey as a research agenda ordered by consequence.

Figshare
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon