Prevalence and risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect formation: a retrospective cohort study

To determine the prevalence of previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD) in a referred cohort, identify associated risk factors, and develop a nomogram for individualized risk estimation. This retrospective single-center study analyzed 156 women who underwent cesarean delivery between 2021 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center and received routine postoperative transvaginal ultrasound 1–6 months after surgery. PCSD was diagnosed when a wedge-shaped or cystic anechoic defect at the cesarean scar communicated with the uterine cavity and disrupted myometrial continuity. Patients were classified into PCSD ( n = 43) and non-PCSD ( n = 113) groups. Independent predictors were identified by multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated with 500 bootstrap resamples and ROC analysis. PCSD prevalence was 27.56% (43/156). Four independent predictors were identified: a higher number of cesarean deliveries (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.27–8.05), emergency cesarean section (OR = 3.25, 95% CI: 1.38–7.64), retroverted uterus (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.04–5.01), and low-positioned incision near the internal cervical os (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.16–7.70). The model showed an apparent AUC of 0.858 (95% CI: 0.793–0.923) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.821 after 500 bootstrap resamples. Calibration was acceptable, with a calibration slope of 0.874, intercept of − 0.032, Hosmer–Lemeshow P = 0.609, and Brier score of 0.163. Decision curve analysis suggested positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.14–0.86 in the development cohort. The nomogram showed acceptable apparent and internally validated performance for estimating PCSD risk in this development cohort. It may support early postoperative risk stratification and counseling, but external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-05050-5
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect formation: a retrospective cohort study

Shuang Li, Tao Wei, Hui Cheng, Chuanzheng Li
BMC Women s Health
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Prevalence and risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect formation: a retrospective cohort study

Shuang Li, Tao Wei, Hui Cheng, Chuanzheng Li
article en

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD) in a referred cohort, identify associated risk factors, and develop a nomogram for individualized risk estimation. This retrospective single-center study analyzed 156 women who underwent cesarean delivery between 2021 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center and received routine postoperative transvaginal ultrasound 1–6 months after surgery. PCSD was diagnosed when a wedge-shaped or cystic anechoic defect at the cesarean scar communicated with the uterine cavity and disrupted myometrial continuity. Patients were classified into PCSD ( n = 43) and non-PCSD ( n = 113) groups. Independent predictors were identified by multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated with 500 bootstrap resamples and ROC analysis. PCSD prevalence was 27.56% (43/156). Four independent predictors were identified: a higher number of cesarean deliveries (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.27–8.05), emergency cesarean section (OR = 3.25, 95% CI: 1.38–7.64), retroverted uterus (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.04–5.01), and low-positioned incision near the internal cervical os (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.16–7.70). The model showed an apparent AUC of 0.858 (95% CI: 0.793–0.923) and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.821 after 500 bootstrap resamples. Calibration was acceptable, with a calibration slope of 0.874, intercept of − 0.032, Hosmer–Lemeshow P = 0.609, and Brier score of 0.163. Decision curve analysis suggested positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.14–0.86 in the development cohort. The nomogram showed acceptable apparent and internally validated performance for estimating PCSD risk in this development cohort. It may support early postoperative risk stratification and counseling, but external validation is required before clinical implementation.

BMC Women s Health
Xuzhou Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Prevalence and risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect formation: a retrospective cohort study — Shuang Li, Tao Wei, et al. · BMC Women s Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS