Further Extensive Evaluation of GHB‐Pentose as a Novel Biomarker for the Extended Detection of GHB Intake/Administration in Forensic Casework

ABSTRACT Gamma‐hydroxybutyrate (GHB) detection in forensic toxicology is hampered by its rapid elimination and endogenous occurrence. GHB‐pentose has recently emerged as a promising biomarker capable of extending the detection window of GHB exposure but requires further evaluation in authentic forensic samples. We systematically investigated GHB‐pentose using two independent LC–MS/MS methods based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and reversed‐phase (RP) chromatography. Positive findings were evaluated against measured GHB concentrations, case information, matrix type, and concordance between analytical methods. Among 2414 urine cases, 97.6% were negative for GHB and GHB‐pentose. GHB‐pentose could be detected in all 21 GHB‐positive urine samples from living individuals and in four GHB‐positive postmortem cases, whereas 20 other postmortem urine samples with elevated GHB concentrations (10–26 mg/L) were negative for GHB‐pentose. Based on toxicological expert assessment performed independently prior to this study, it was assumed that the GHB detected in these cases was more likely the result of postmortem formation than of prior GHB intake. Fourteen GHB‐negative urine samples were positive for GHB‐pentose; eight of these contained case information supporting previous GHB exposure, including three suspected drug‐facilitated crimes sampled 13–16 h after the incident. GHB‐pentose appears to be a highly specific biomarker of exogenous GHB exposure, capable of extending the detection window beyond that of GHB itself and potentially serving as a discriminant between exogenous GHB administration and endogenous, particularly postmortem, GHB formation. Routine LC–MS/MS screening is feasible, even in the absence of a reference standard, supporting its immediate implementation in forensic toxicology workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Testing and Analysis
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.70183
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Further Extensive Evaluation of GHB‐Pentose as a Novel Biomarker for the Extended Detection of GHB Intake/Administration in Forensic Casework

Oliver Gero Bosch, Erich Seifritz, Francesco Bavato, Laura Katharina Schnider et al.
Drug Testing and Analysis
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Further Extensive Evaluation of GHB‐Pentose as a Novel Biomarker for the Extended Detection of GHB Intake/Administration in Forensic Casework

Oliver Gero Bosch, Erich Seifritz, Francesco Bavato, Laura Katharina Schnider, Dario Dornbierer, Christian Steuer, Boris B. Quednow, Lana Brockbals, Thomas Kræmer, Andrea Eva Steuer, Sandra N. Poetzsch, Katja Gimmler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gamma‐hydroxybutyrate (GHB) detection in forensic toxicology is hampered by its rapid elimination and endogenous occurrence. GHB‐pentose has recently emerged as a promising biomarker capable of extending the detection window of GHB exposure but requires further evaluation in authentic forensic samples. We systematically investigated GHB‐pentose using two independent LC–MS/MS methods based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and reversed‐phase (RP) chromatography. Positive findings were evaluated against measured GHB concentrations, case information, matrix type, and concordance between analytical methods. Among 2414 urine cases, 97.6% were negative for GHB and GHB‐pentose. GHB‐pentose could be detected in all 21 GHB‐positive urine samples from living individuals and in four GHB‐positive postmortem cases, whereas 20 other postmortem urine samples with elevated GHB concentrations (10–26 mg/L) were negative for GHB‐pentose. Based on toxicological expert assessment performed independently prior to this study, it was assumed that the GHB detected in these cases was more likely the result of postmortem formation than of prior GHB intake. Fourteen GHB‐negative urine samples were positive for GHB‐pentose; eight of these contained case information supporting previous GHB exposure, including three suspected drug‐facilitated crimes sampled 13–16 h after the incident. GHB‐pentose appears to be a highly specific biomarker of exogenous GHB exposure, capable of extending the detection window beyond that of GHB itself and potentially serving as a discriminant between exogenous GHB administration and endogenous, particularly postmortem, GHB formation. Routine LC–MS/MS screening is feasible, even in the absence of a reference standard, supporting its immediate implementation in forensic toxicology workflows.

Drug Testing and Analysis
University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (CH), Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon