Evaluating the Effects of Democracy and Corporatism on CO2 Emissions

This project evaluates the relationship between democracy levels and corporatism on carbon dioxide emissions in 24 countries from 1990-2010. My research question is two-fold. First, I aim to answer the question do democracies improve environmental quality? This question has been debated and empirical results are ambiguous according to country subset, time period and environmental indicator. This relationship is especially ambiguous concerning air emissions. Second, I aim to answer the question do more corporatist states improve environmental quality? Impacts of institutional structure on environmental performance have also been debated with limited and contradicting empirical results. To test these relationships, I use four multiple regression analyses. My analysis contributes to existing research with data in an updated time period and broader country set. Additionally, I test for an interaction between democracy and corporatism to evaluate their combined effects. Although some literature suggests that democratic states improve environmental quality, I find that democracy levels do not have a significant effect on CO emissions. Corporatism, however, has a significant negative effect on CO, emissions in all models. Finally, I find that when evaluated for an interaction, democracy and corporatism together have a significant negative effect on CO emissions. These findings suggest that alone, democracy does not improve environmental quality. Corporatism, however, does significantly improve environmental quality. More importantly, the two combined, democracy and corporatism, are stronger than democracy alone in improving environmental quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/cms4-n630
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Effects of Democracy and Corporatism on CO2 Emissions

Eleanor Sadik-Khan
Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Evaluating the Effects of Democracy and Corporatism on CO2 Emissions

Eleanor Sadik-Khan
article en

Abstract

This project evaluates the relationship between democracy levels and corporatism on carbon dioxide emissions in 24 countries from 1990-2010. My research question is two-fold. First, I aim to answer the question do democracies improve environmental quality? This question has been debated and empirical results are ambiguous according to country subset, time period and environmental indicator. This relationship is especially ambiguous concerning air emissions. Second, I aim to answer the question do more corporatist states improve environmental quality? Impacts of institutional structure on environmental performance have also been debated with limited and contradicting empirical results. To test these relationships, I use four multiple regression analyses. My analysis contributes to existing research with data in an updated time period and broader country set. Additionally, I test for an interaction between democracy and corporatism to evaluate their combined effects. Although some literature suggests that democratic states improve environmental quality, I find that democracy levels do not have a significant effect on CO emissions. Corporatism, however, has a significant negative effect on CO, emissions in all models. Finally, I find that when evaluated for an interaction, democracy and corporatism together have a significant negative effect on CO emissions. These findings suggest that alone, democracy does not improve environmental quality. Corporatism, however, does significantly improve environmental quality. More importantly, the two combined, democracy and corporatism, are stronger than democracy alone in improving environmental quality.

Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon