Beyond Rankings: Tree Plots for Co-word Analysis of Mobile Health Research in JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Using Cohen’s d Effect Sizes (2017–2026): Bibliometric Analysis (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Bibliometric rankings summarize research output but may obscure the strongest network links and the degree of concentration among leading contributors or topics. OBJECTIVE To map publication trends, collaboration, and themes in mHealth research published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, and assess FLCA tree plots and the Absolute Advantage Coefficient (AAC) as complementary summaries. METHODS We analyzed English-language Web of Science Core Collection records published from 2017 through 2026. We summarized annual output and citation patterns and constructed article-level co-occurrence networks for countries, institutions, departments, authors, journal/year, and keywords. The follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA) retained each follower’s strongest weighted co-occurrence degree link to a leader. AAC was calculated from the top three values and interpreted using cutoffs calibrated to conventional Cohen’s d benchmarks. Career-level coauthorship for the most productive author was described using AAC, structural hole capacity (SHC), collaboration leadership index (CLI), and middle-author rate (MAR). RESULTS The analysis included 1,878 records: 1,579 articles and 299 reviews. Annual output peaked at 388 records in 2020. The United States led country output (641 records; h-index, 64), followed by the United Kingdom (238) and China (209); country AAC was 0.703, below the 0.712 medium-effect boundary. The University of California System led institutional output (89; AAC, 0.504). Table rankings tied Christine Jacob and Puhong Zhang at six publications each. The leading keywords were HEALTH (227), CARE (199), and INTERVENTIONS (163); their AAC of 0.483 was within the negligible-effect range (0.410–0.590). In the plotted author tree, AAC was 0.600; the department tree AAC was 0.586. In Jacob’s career network, her 19 publications compared with 3 for each of the next two coauthors, yielding an AAC of 0.864; SHC and CLI were 0.667, and MAR was 50%. FLCA trees displayed strongest links across the analyzed domains. CONCLUSIONS FLCA tree plots made strongest-link structures visible, while AAC described concentration beyond rank order. Keyword concentration was s small effect size, country concentration was small and near the medium boundary, and Jacob’s career network showed a large leading-author gap. Findings represent one journal’s WoSCC records and may not generalize to all mHealth research.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.116168
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Beyond Rankings: Tree Plots for Co-word Analysis of Mobile Health Research in JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Using Cohen’s d Effect Sizes (2017–2026): Bibliometric Analysis (Preprint)

Willy Chou, Tsair‐Wei Chien, Lifan Chen
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
preprint

Beyond Rankings: Tree Plots for Co-word Analysis of Mobile Health Research in JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Using Cohen’s d Effect Sizes (2017–2026): Bibliometric Analysis (Preprint)

Willy Chou, Tsair‐Wei Chien, Lifan Chen
preprint en

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bibliometric rankings summarize research output but may obscure the strongest network links and the degree of concentration among leading contributors or topics. OBJECTIVE To map publication trends, collaboration, and themes in mHealth research published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, and assess FLCA tree plots and the Absolute Advantage Coefficient (AAC) as complementary summaries. METHODS We analyzed English-language Web of Science Core Collection records published from 2017 through 2026. We summarized annual output and citation patterns and constructed article-level co-occurrence networks for countries, institutions, departments, authors, journal/year, and keywords. The follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA) retained each follower’s strongest weighted co-occurrence degree link to a leader. AAC was calculated from the top three values and interpreted using cutoffs calibrated to conventional Cohen’s d benchmarks. Career-level coauthorship for the most productive author was described using AAC, structural hole capacity (SHC), collaboration leadership index (CLI), and middle-author rate (MAR). RESULTS The analysis included 1,878 records: 1,579 articles and 299 reviews. Annual output peaked at 388 records in 2020. The United States led country output (641 records; h-index, 64), followed by the United Kingdom (238) and China (209); country AAC was 0.703, below the 0.712 medium-effect boundary. The University of California System led institutional output (89; AAC, 0.504). Table rankings tied Christine Jacob and Puhong Zhang at six publications each. The leading keywords were HEALTH (227), CARE (199), and INTERVENTIONS (163); their AAC of 0.483 was within the negligible-effect range (0.410–0.590). In the plotted author tree, AAC was 0.600; the department tree AAC was 0.586. In Jacob’s career network, her 19 publications compared with 3 for each of the next two coauthors, yielding an AAC of 0.864; SHC and CLI were 0.667, and MAR was 50%. FLCA trees displayed strongest links across the analyzed domains. CONCLUSIONS FLCA tree plots made strongest-link structures visible, while AAC described concentration beyond rank order. Keyword concentration was s small effect size, country concentration was small and near the medium boundary, and Jacob’s career network showed a large leading-author gap. Findings represent one journal’s WoSCC records and may not generalize to all mHealth research.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon