A trajetória de Tennessee Williams em dicionários biográficos documentais: uma leitura crítica e dialética

The article critically examines how the trajectory and critical reception of the American playwright and writer Tennessee Williams were shaped by censorship, canonization, and erasure throughout the Twentieth Century. Through a dialectical reading of documentary volumes, especially the Dictionary of Literary Biography Documentary Series, it demonstrates that his consecration as a tragic genius functioned as an ideological strategy of political and biographical neutralization. By comparing archives, catalogs, and other publications, the study reveals the literary canon as a field of dispute between memory and forgetting. It concludes that the revaluation of marginal materials and Williams’s late plays restores to his work its aesthetic complexity and critical insurgency, transforming the archive into an active instrument of cultural resistance and historical reinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antares letras e humanidades
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18226/19844921.v18.n40.14
Primary Topic
American Literature and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A trajetória de Tennessee Williams em dicionários biográficos documentais: uma leitura crítica e dialética

Luis Marcio Arnaut de Toledo
Antares letras e humanidades
American Literature and Culture
article

A trajetória de Tennessee Williams em dicionários biográficos documentais: uma leitura crítica e dialética

Luis Marcio Arnaut de Toledo
article en

Abstract

The article critically examines how the trajectory and critical reception of the American playwright and writer Tennessee Williams were shaped by censorship, canonization, and erasure throughout the Twentieth Century. Through a dialectical reading of documentary volumes, especially the Dictionary of Literary Biography Documentary Series, it demonstrates that his consecration as a tragic genius functioned as an ideological strategy of political and biographical neutralization. By comparing archives, catalogs, and other publications, the study reveals the literary canon as a field of dispute between memory and forgetting. It concludes that the revaluation of marginal materials and Williams’s late plays restores to his work its aesthetic complexity and critical insurgency, transforming the archive into an active instrument of cultural resistance and historical reinterpretation.

Antares letras e humanidadesVol. 18(40)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
American Literature and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon